this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
1412 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

28764 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 250 points 1 week ago (4 children)

out of all the censored things, they didn't think to censor a product key before declassifying it. I wish I could say I was surprised.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 218 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This seems to suggest that the redactions weren't done by legal professionals.

[–] SchadeMarmelade@feddit.org 108 points 1 week ago

Understatement of the year so far.

[–] BitsAndBites@lemmy.world 152 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The product key didnt have -TRUMP- in it so it's fine

[–] M137@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Imagine if it did and the only reason it was censored was because they did a search and find > TRUMP > Make selected text background black.

[–] bobo@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've only seen videos of it, but apparently you can copy paste the redacted parts of the pdfs. They legit left all of the text data on a different layer.

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I wish the people who found that would’ve kept their mouths shut until 100% is released

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Unfortunately with an error so egregious, the amount of people who found that near instantly was probably in the thousands

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. I dabble in competitive assessment and the amount of times weve got competitors data because they didnt flatten a file is astounding. The one we try every time with moderate success is checking every picture to see if you can "uncrop" it. So many times the rest of the picture is actually in the file and the crop is just for display purposes. Most of the time the rest of the photo is useless, but ill never forget the time we got the whole process map for their upcoming production schedule

[–] ReplicantBatty@lemmy.one 9 points 1 week ago

That sounds like a pretty cool job, do you have any other stories you could share?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

FWIW they've always been bad at redacting things, this has happened before with other documents IIRC

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

It wasn't an error.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They're never going to be 100% released.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Yea I saw this as well, it was only a handful of documents but they did indeed do that on them.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Yep on mobile I could select the blackouts and do a copy paste into a note app.

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a product key for an old no longer supported* product.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yea but it's still a valid key! the opsec part of me is dying atm.

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think a product key is directly a security risk. Though the sloppy undisciplined nature of this release is indirectly a risk I suppose.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't believe it's a security risk either, however it's considered a secure token/crediential, so those aren't supposed to be given public.