this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
60 points (98.4% liked)

Political Humor

1947 readers
27 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/53694096

Niels Bohr famously dissolved the medal he got for his Nobel Price for chemistry in acid when the Nazis invaded his home country of Denmark, to prevent it from falling into the Nazis' hands.

Unlike him, the most recent recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize of all things, who shall not be named here, because she doesn't deserve being named, handed her medal to a deranged megalomaniac and fascist wannabe dictator.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We're blaming her instead of trump...?

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For giving her medal to Trump?

Yes. Unless Trump gained a mind control machine since last we checked.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yep, keeping him from humiliating himself with a token was definitely worth endangering herself and her country's people.

That medal means nothing in his hands and everyone knows it. I can't believe we're pretending she wasn't coerced publicly and that a "mind control machine" is needed

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, keeping him from humiliating himself with a token was definitely worth endangering herself and her country’s people.

What danger to her country has been reduced by giving (or attempting to give) Trump the medal?

That medal means nothing in his hands and everyone knows it. I can’t believe we’re pretending she wasn’t coerced publicly and that a “mind control machine” is needed

Fuck, man, she's a politician and a grown-ass woman. She makes decisions, and she's fucking responsible for them. She started her bootlicking for Trump upon receiving the award. I don't know why this is controversial.

Regardless of whether you think it was a good move or a bad move, it was her fucking choice, and people are right to ascribe agency to her in judging it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

And I don't know how it's controversial that a piece of metal is worth the risk of a dictator doing whatever he wants in retaliation. You ask what danger there is.. this is like asking what a mob boss threat is worth. Giving him that literally changes nothing except it makes Trump look pathetic and desperate on the world stage. No one thinks he earned the award except the people who already think he's God regardless of what he does.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

What are you talking about? She literally asked the US to invade. She has no interest in protecting her country. She hosted a webinar with execs and said if they get the US to invade she'll make sure they all get fat oil contracts.

She was literally calling for war.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She could have not given him her medal.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

Yep, keeping him from humiliating himself with a token was definitely worth endangering herself and her country's people.

That medal means nothing in his hands and everyone knows it.

[–] guy@piefed.social -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There seems to be some limit to how far you can go in order to democratize your country. 🤷

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not sure what you mean or why we're getting downvoted. The physical token of the Nobel Peace prize means nothing in the hands of a thief. Not sure why people are pretending she had much choice in this. The toddler would've certainly thrown a tantrum had she refused and it's almost certainly not worth it.

If anything, handing it over makes trump look bad for not only wanting it, but stealing it.