this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24188 readers
455 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Do you have to contact them? Why can't you just pirate? I thought that was the point.

Authors Sue NVIDIA for Copyright Infringement

Like other tech companies, NVIDIA has also seen significant legal pushback from copyright holders in response to its training methods. This includes authors, who, in various lawsuits, accused tech companies of training their models on pirated books.

Ahhhh

For me personally I don't have a coherent opinion

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

They can just drop like $5 to Anna's archive and then download 30tb

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There also may be an element of trying legally offload responsibility. If you're paying someone else for access, you have the insurance to say you didn't know you were getting pirated material, you paid for it and assumed that was then licensed!

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Anna’s Archive Points Out Legal ‘Concern’

According to the complaint, Anna’s Archive then warned Nvidia that its library was illegally acquired and maintained. Because the site previously wasted time on other AI companies, the pirate library asked NVIDIA executives if they had internal permission to move forward.

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

I'm definitely not arguing NVIDIA didn't know what they were doing. They probably didn't think their internal emails would get leaked.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Anna’s Archive then warned Nvidia that its library was illegally acquired and maintained.

Very funny

[–] jimw@mander.xyz 22 points 1 week ago

In the article, they mention you can get ultra fast access - if you pay Anna's for that.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah I don't understand why they couldn't just download the torrents with all of the website's books and be done with it.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they wanted high-speed database access

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Downloading the torrents is one thing. Actually leeching stuff another. At least Meta seems to have had some difficulties due to the low number of seeders.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Oh, yeah, I guess. Every time I've used torrents to get the books it hasn't been very slow. But I imagine when you're downloading terabytes of books it's a very different situation

[–] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Aside from the speed issue, AA also has an impressive collection of metadata that isn't always captured within the files themselves. They also have metadata for a ton of books that aren't in their collection(yet).