this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
993 points (99.5% liked)

World News

52363 readers
3441 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) announced just one day after the U.S. officially withdrew from the World Health Organization (WHO) that his state would become the first to join the organization’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, in a seeming rebuke of the Trump administration’s withdrawal from international collaborations.

Newsom traveled this week to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he was scheduled to speak at an event but was canceled at the last moment. During his trip, he met with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HydraBenny@lemmy.world 91 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I feel like the USA may start to be disbanding

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, balkanization may be our only option at this point.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

China recognized long ago that all states falter after around 250 years, and that renewal is a natural part of human institution.

The biggest mistake of the founding fathers was to assume the permanence of our institutions was okay since checks and balances were instituted. Really all they do is delay the time between cycles of corruption.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

One of the founders thought we should draft a new constitution from scratch every few years and they created the ammendment system specifically so any part could be scrapped and remade in case there were problems. They clearly didn't think it was perfect, just good enough for the time. They certainly didn't expect us to slow down and stop with the ammendments, at least.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 1 points 14 hours ago

I think the flaw there is in assuming that the corruption would first come from the corruption of the law. Thing is they did create a good system to protect the law, but they didn’t realize that’s only just kicking the ball down the road where then its the institutions which corrupt first.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We need an East Rome West Rome split but its blue state vs red state. Each get their own President, pool Military powers

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or maybe nix the president position and just have the house and senate vote for everything like a council.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or maybe a parliament with proper representation instead of this stupid system you've got going right now.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's realistically the only fix for gerrymandering. It's a powerful weapon, and I don't foresee the two parties honoring any agreement not to use it.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How does a parliament fix gerrymandering?

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

I think they’re saying to get rid of it. No one would complain.

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ditch the senate and bump the house to like 1500 members imo.

[–] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Keep the Senate, bump the house to like 1500

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It should be actually, if not for the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, based on the 1910 census.

At the time the average was 210,000 constituents per representative, now we're over 770,000 per representative. And those are averages, some districts are much higher and lower.

Congress set the current limit, they can change it. It doesn't require an amendment or anything complicated.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but why would they dilute their power?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

The most obvious would be to prevent the exact situation we're in now. But that would also require more than a handful of them to not be psycho/sociopaths.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

The trouble with that is the blue states would be the coasts, and the red states down the middle...

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

After a century of coups and destabilisation efforts around the world, the empire will crumble from within (nothing new tbh). How poetic!