this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
834 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27418 readers
4673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A masked guy breaks down your door w/o an Article III warrant absent exigent circumstances? Yeah, I'd agree. Trick will be that pressing the murder charge would be federal since a federal agent dies in the line of official work (though illegal), which would give the president grounds to push for death.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

These cowards come in heavily armed a dozen at once. Even if you manage to shoot one, you're as good as dead when the others start firing back.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Sure.

Except if everyone they're doing this to did the same thing, that would be one less coward every time there was one less victim.

And the country would run out of cowards before it ran out of victims.

[–] durindana@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

There will be shitloads fewer incidents after the first few pigs get blasted, though.

This is a tragedy of the commons where the grass needs to start shooting

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying go out and shoot people. Hell no. I just want out of the country. I am not interested in being a fighter. My best advice is to do whatever you can to stay safe. I have ZERO fantasies of shooting ANYONE. The Federal Government's own training when you're being pursued is 1. Run, 2. Hide. 3. Fight. I ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS recommend avoiding conflict whenever possible and to be as far away from conflict as possible.

That being said, I am someone who's trained with a firearm, and I'm the kind of person who can shoot a target multiple times and leave a single hole. I am also someone who has experienced having a team with multiple high-powered rifles with scopes trained on me at the same time. No, I'm not a criminal. It was a SWAT team and a case of mistaken identity, and you better DAMN well believe that my cool head and capable handling of the situation at the time resulted in me de-escalating the situation and being here today.

But if someone's breaking down your door (and I'm not specifically referring to ICE) and you're pretty sure you're going to die regardless of whether it's in your home or wherever they're going to take you next, I think it might be feasible for a significant number of people to hit a single person. It wouldn't just be one less person doing that to one victim, but that one less person doing it to many many other victims and potential victims.

I want to be perfectly clear. I have no intention of shooting anyone. And I'm not someone who's likely to be targeted.

There aren't millions of people busting down doors. Most of those people busting into people's homes and doing this stuff are people who have done this to more than one person.

I am in NO way advocating believing that you're some kind of vigilante and going out to hurt ANYONE right now. And I very much AM advocating running and getting out if at all possible.

PLEASE get out, if you can.

But if people react when their home is invaded, I understand it.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I’m the kind of person who can shoot a target multiple times and leave a single hole.

I gotta call BS. Such people dont actually exist when you're talking multiple shots. Unless you count tightly grouped holes that roughly overlap but also expand the "single" hole. Its extraorindarily remotely possible for it to happen once.

[–] shaw@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a reason why the left always ridiculed the right's fantasies of resisting the government with weapons.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've never heard the left do that. That's pretty much always been liberals. Unless you mean ridicule the right for claiming to not be bootlickers.

[–] shaw@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Firstly, liberals are the left in the US, unless the context implies otherwise, but I get it, reading comprehenhion is difficult. Secondly, your argument is an anectodal fallacy.

It took no time to find examples: https://x.com/workercouncil_p/status/2014093346591977498 https://x.com/glendaEmoore/status/1552739463180288006

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If things continue the way they've been going, you'll be dead either way.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think its very likely that there wont be another election where they voluntarily relinquish even a tiny bit of power. Even if we have an election it'll be purely for show.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cowards, yes! 90% of them will shit their pants and shoot themselves or team kill. They chickened out of military service and are too stupid to become police officers.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Anecdotal reports are that the worse cops in a number of police departments quit to join ICE. Like the cops that other cops don't like.