World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Off the top of my head I don't know what time you're referring to but..
Is it "crying" for help, or just trying to utilize FEMA.. the thing that's setup for that exact situation?
I was referring to the 2020 fires. And It was both. I say "crying" because literally one week the vocal statement was "we don't need the federal government" and the next week it was "you need to give us federal aid now".
Yes, that is what FEMA is for, and California should (and did) get it. But the F is FEMA is Federal. You can't have it both ways.
Again, I'm not for or against the concept. I'm just saying its very clear California is not able to separate.
I think there's a clear distinction between your characterization and the reality which is that California contributes massively to the US government in EXCHANGE for federally funded services like FEMA. The money California generates for the US could just be relegated to their own FEMA.
That's a fair point. The FEMA funding can be redirected. However my "characterization" is based on the tone of actual responses so that doesn't make it inaccurate. But I'll go with that wording because I think its a good description as well.
My point is, the California budget is in shambles constantly. This fact is emphasized by negatives in the state as well. I do not believe that the state government can adequately create a functioning independent government, even if they get to keep their federal payments. More money doesn't fix inherent problems. They haven't proven that they can't manage what they are doing today, let alone give them more responsibility.
I think its not a very mature outlook to discuss independence when you don't have your crap together.
You seem to believe that the CA government has good management over everything. I'm OK with that but I disagree. And I think that's the root of the separation in our thinking and interpretation of things.
I actually think it would be a good serious consideration of breaking from the union, but I'm not sold on it. And I don't think the state is ready to have that discussion.
Nah I'm mostly coming from a funding point of view. If the budget management is fucked, then it's fucked. Though I wonder if conservatives fleeing California after secession would alleviate that. Either way, it's a fair point. Thanks for providing more insight!
If California didn't send $80 billion more to the federal gov't than it got back every year, I don't think they'd need FEMA.
I just responded to another comment about this. I agree that keeping the money we pay to the federal government can be redistributed, but I'm not confident the government has the proper structure to do so.
Basically, they mismanage what they do today, so why should I conclude they can handle additional responsibilities tomorrow? More money doesn't fix existing problems. Fix the problems first, get your existing budget in line, address the current responsibilities adequately, and that's evidence you'll do a good job with more.