this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
225 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

14410 readers
1680 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It really doesn't, especially if it makes you look less like an ordinary human. You absolutely don't want them to think you're an expert rider who doesn't need space, or something like that.

You don't need them to see you from space. You need them to see you from just far enough away, but actually care enough not to endanger you.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Bizarre to argue against added visibility improving safety

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're trying to argue a nuanced point and yall are being intentionally pedantic as to miss it, for shame.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm so far under the impression that added visibility is still good. They referenced studies saying there's a dropoff where it causes more harm than good, as mentioned earlier, but I haven't seen that yet

So pump the brakes a bit, friend

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah friend my fixie doesn't have brakes to pump, you replied with the same one-liner twice in a row without engaging anything they said, not cool!

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

same one-liner

It's a simple point, for the nuance I'd like to see something to change my mind tbh. I'm under the impression that unless you go ridiculous then added visibility helps everyone

my fixie doesn't have brakes to pump

Hah is that a joke about the stereotype? Pretty good

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well, truth is often stranger than fiction. Look at the research. Once a threshhold of visibility is achieved, more is not better. Beyond a point, more is actually detrimental.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 10 hours ago

Sounds interesting. Do you have these studies? I've always just read that visibility is a plus in traffic.