Title is a reference to a recent Semi-Ramblomatic video by Yahtzee.
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
569 points (92.9% liked)
tumblr
5595 readers
1688 users here now
Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
-
No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.
Sister Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Eh, depends on the subject matter. Some things definitely have trends that divided down gender lines, and it's not sexist to point this out. Men trend towards violence, women trend towards relational and social dynamics. The raw numbers back this up, but there are exceptions (obviously).
Noticing trends is one thing, overgeneralizing is another matter. This is an overgeneralization and it's harmful because it reinforces traits of toxic masculinity. "If you're not violent then you're effeminate" is not the message we should be sending.
This isn't incorrect. I just tend to disassociate when I see blanket statements about men because I usually don't fit the description.
It's good to be vigilant about this stuff but I'm pretty sure this tumblr user is mostly shitposting, and it's clearly against toxic masculinity. I mean the distilled message of the post is "we are all the same".
Excusing overgeneralizations when they're applied to men? That's typical...
I guarantee you would feel different if someone was overgeneralizing about women. Do they just need to grow thicker skin, or is it only men who are supposed to be stoics?
Like I said above, I agree with you. A similar statement about women would be correctly seen as mysogyny. I'm just stating that it isn't any more egregious than gestures broadly
There's a lot of egregious stuff going on, but I don't think stooping to the level of egregiousness and turning the same bullshit around on anyone who seems like a convenient target is a tenable solution. That's letting the egregiousness win.