this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
394 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27418 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The short answer is, the more of your face you cover, the harder it is to ID someone. If you wear a hat and a face mask, they will not be able to use facial recognition to identify you, to my knowledge.

There is still stuff like gait analysis, but that’s also relatively hard unless they have a bunch of visuals of you walking. Which they may have. But wearing a mask does make it discernibly more difficult for them to ID you.

That said, thank you for having the courage to resist openly. We do need it, and it does matter. I personally mask because of health reasons and generally trying to throw a wrench in the surveillance state (I hate being ad targeted, much less state targeted). But I get so much motivation out of seeing my fellow folks show up to resist in all the ways that they want to personally.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, as a privileged, white male I don't cover up my face. I'll be a face for others or take that place. I'm statistically better off being targeted than a non-white person.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah unfortunately that doesn’t protect you any more either. We’ve seen that.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately so. Still, immunity is not what I seek over speaking up right now.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Take a lot of care, your country needs you.

The easier way and I think I’m preaching to the converted here is general strike. I’d rather see you be jobless, homeless and hungry for a year than dead. It’s a brutal way to put it but there are levels of difficulty and hardship to this.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I've been thinking about that a lot. I'm watching and listening as it keeps getting brpught up. Not many unions in my state right now, but even so, it was talked about today at the protest.

Edit: reply duplicated itself

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I saw the dupe hahaha

It’s the only way for citizens now. It’s hard because it absolutely means huge personal sacrifice for many. I think there’s enough people in the country on the right side, that could take the hardship to be successful with numbers. I spoke to one yesterday who despite their best wishes is arm deep in the machine as they put it and they’re right. That said, there comes a point where even they have to consider shutting down production.

That should force the Houses, or enough people within them, to invoke whatever amendment (25th I believe?) to remove the administration. The guilty ones will run; that’s fine provided the next government is one that means business and follows through on extradition. The goal is to restore decent government; accountability happens afterward anyway.

You’ll have to live with their shitty base, that said, they need to be held accountable where possible as well. Most of them will turn and lie their way out of it. They’re all shitty people.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 2 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah, I never thought I would find myself happier with a do-nothing representative, but this is active harm and way worse. I left my shitty job a few months ago, and have considered organizing a protest or two around the state capital building. I wish I had a better way to personally hit big businesses, like that one guy who emailed contractor invoices to google and amazon and was paid tens of thousands for nothing.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 39 minutes ago

Hahaha yeah I remember that, what a blast from the past!

Yeah you and people like you will drive this, those that do have some wiggle room. Others see people doing something too; that’s where normal, organised protests play their role.