this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
136 points (97.2% liked)

News

34536 readers
5686 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prices for nearly every major U.S. crop are below what it costs to grow them. But a drop in rice prices means another blow to farmers in Mississippi’s agricultural belt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

This means that your agriculture is imported? ironically one of the few areas most nation protect with toll barriers.

I can't get my head around that industry. In my area there are several vegetable farms, most are sold long before harvesting. So one year they had a amazing cauliflower year. Yields above expected. But they could not sell the excess as there was no buyers. So I could drive past looking at happy elks gorging themselves on delicious cauliflower before they plowed it into the field. And then I went to the local grocery store and bought plastic wrapped cauliflower from Spain...

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The logistics of agriculture are outrageous. I just don't get why you wouldn't try to make something out of an unwanted crop. You really can't find one use for that much plant matter? Ferment and/or distill it, get in touch with food banks, anything.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

Cauliflower is used to make like noodles for fat people too, there are uses for it.

[–] SilverCode@lemmy.ml 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

My main exposure to crop farming has been through the series Clarkson's Farm, so I'm no expert ...

... but from what I understand it costs a hell of a lot of money to rent the equipment needed to harvest the crop, and then you still need to store and process it. If there is no guarantee you can sell the end product, sinking loads of money into the harvest is less appealing than just cutting your losses and letting the crop rot.

[–] Airowird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago

As extra benefit, plowing them back into the soil means the nutrients get recycled, so less fertilizer needed next year.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It seems like the kind of market inefficiency capitalism so often touts itself as the answer to. Why not make an agreement with a brewery to take the rice, and share any profits from sake? Just as an example, I don't know if that exact scenario could work with this sort of rice. Pairing up excess produce with businesses who don't mind getting free materials shouldn't be that hard.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

Which would be a good function of the government, to make sure produce finds a market, and doesn't get wasted. As long as we subsidize, and we should to protect our abilities to grow food if not for sugar and corn, we should be doing it to lower costs for citizens and to make sure nothing gets wasted.

Like in 2020 during the pandemic, crops were rotting in the fields. They were throwing around trillions of dollars to subsidize corporate profits, but we couldn't be bothered to make sure crops didn't get wasted.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

thats why its extremely subsidized.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Then it is a waste of money as well, no?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Part of the reason you subsidize is that overproduction most years is a feature. You dont want a "not enough food" situation in the lean years, and growing enough to make sure of that guarantees that the farmers go broke.

That said, the specifics of how and what the US subsidies go to are pretty bad: we mostly pay for the creation of cattle feed and motor vehicle fuel.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 14 hours ago

I get that. It's a shame that food isn't treated as a pubic good that simply needs to be provided for free at the point of consumption. I know some people would maybe overeat, but it's not like making them pay has solved that problem.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

We subsidize for corn syrup and sugar to a large degree too, products americans get way too much of, because they are artificially cheap, it's a cheap filler in processed foods.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Inspite of all the advances in agriculture it is still a very volatile industry. Everything from weather to climate to insects to pests to weeds to infection can affect the yield. In addition with scale come problems in harvest, storage, processing. Although there is a lot of mechanisation it is till very labour intensive.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago

Inspite

Not a word, my dude: it's two. Trust your spell-check.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago

i heard they get money for not selling crops in the us, that fits the bill. Elks arnt going hungry thats for sure.