651

A little over a week after a prosecutor in Georgia indicted former President Donald Trump for trying to overturn the results of the state’s 2020 presidential election, Republicans said they will use a new law to remove her from office.

In May, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed the law that created a new commission of political appointees with the power to remove and discipline elected prosecutors over decisions or policies not to prosecute certain offenses. The law seeks to limit or restrict reform-minded prosecutors. In the case of Fulton County — which includes Atlanta — though, District Attorney Fani Willis is not even known as much of a reformer. Instead, Republican lawmakers set their sights on Willis for another reason: prosecuting the wrong person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 388 points 1 year ago

Sounds like obstruction of justice.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 308 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the continuation of a coup.

[-] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 152 points 1 year ago

Sounds like more individuals to indict with RICO charges

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago

Is it RICO if these are all separate people committing crimes of their own accord?

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I'm not a lawyer, but from the way the indictment was written it sounded like it was the mission that included you in the group, not the main person.

[-] BillTheTailor@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

That's how RICO works: you don't have to have committed the actual crime, but if your actions materially contributed to the commission of the crime, that's considered pretty much the same thing.

[-] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

The Georgia GOP is going to get itself caught up in federal RICO charges at this rate.

I wonder how that would work.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What if the Florida GOP make a RICO reversal law?

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Uno reverse! (I don't know how to link/post images)

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

If it's done to perpetuate a conspiracy, maybe

[-] Wilibus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm sure Trump's attorney would say no.

[-] InisSieferI@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

It's never stopped after all.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Retaliation is a crime.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Legally? No.

Obstruction is a legal charge. Since what they're doing would be legal--since they wrote the law--it can't be obstruction.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
651 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2844 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS