this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
1243 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

79473 readers
6893 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As evidence, the lawsuit cites unnamed "courageous whistleblowers" who allege that WhatsApp and Meta employees can request to view a user's messages through a simple process, thus bypassing the app's end-to-end encryption. "A worker need only send a 'task' (i.e., request via Meta's internal system) to a Meta engineer with an explanation that they need access to WhatsApp messages for their job," the lawsuit claims. "The Meta engineering team will then grant access -- often without any scrutiny at all -- and the worker's workstation will then have a new window or widget available that can pull up any WhatsApp user's messages based on the user's User ID number, which is unique to a user but identical across all Meta products."

"Once the Meta worker has this access, they can read users' messages by opening the widget; no separate decryption step is required," the 51-page complaint adds. "The WhatsApp messages appear in widgets commingled with widgets containing messages from unencrypted sources. Messages appear almost as soon as they are communicated -- essentially, in real-time. Moreover, access is unlimited in temporal scope, with Meta workers able to access messages from the time users first activated their accounts, including those messages users believe they have deleted." The lawsuit does not provide any technical details to back up the rather sensational claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 48 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

WhatsApp client is closed source. Any claims around E2EE is pointless, since it's impossible to verify.

[–] Flipper@feddit.org 7 points 5 hours ago

For Facebook it doesn't matter if its e2e. They control the client on both sides. They can just let the client sent the clear text data to them.

[–] escapeVelocity@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

TMBE

Trust me bro encryption

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's E2EE alright. Just, don't ask what "ends" we're talking about.

[–] Canigou@jlai.lu 3 points 3 hours ago

Their mouth and Zuckerberg's ass

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -3 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Any claims around E2EE is pointless, since it's impossible to verify.

This is objectively false. Reverse engineering is a thing, as is packet inspection.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago

No it is not. Whatsapp gets several updates a month. How do you keep up with that rate?

[–] snowboardbumvt@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Reverse engineering is theoretically possible, but often very difficult in practice.

I'm not enough of an expert in cryptography to know for sure if packet inspection would allow you to tell if a ciphertext could be decrypted by a second "back door" key. My gut says it's not possible, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Hell, as far as I know, E2EE would be indistinguishable from client to server encryption, where the server can read everything without the need for a secret "backdoor key". You can see that the channel is encrypted, but you can't know who has the other key.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

The easiest way to break E2EE is to copy your private key to Meta's servers. It's very easy to implement, and close to impossible to detect.

[–] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Now you just need Meta to allow you on their networks to inspect packets and reverse engineer their servers because as far as I know, WhatsApp messages are not P2P.

/edit I betcha $5 that the connection from client to server is TLS(https), good luck decrypting that to see what its payload is.

[–] escapeVelocity@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Outside of open-source. That shit is usually illegal

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It isn't. Otherwise security research would never happen for proprietary software and services.

[–] escapeVelocity@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

SureSure no white hat never been sued before