Nah dummy I'm not going to bother to reply to your drivel to entertain your bad faith argument. Go back to your cave.
drmoose
You're conflating the topic and build a strawman so bye
Maybe bit it's more likely it's jus5 entertainment based. Women leagues are created to attract more viewers/participants.
I would say that giving attention is a similar reward to giving money or power. It's better not to.
You only need a few nukes to defeat all missiles China could produce in their entire existence. Any direct hot conflict with possibility of either side's total defeat would turn into a nuclear one.
OK they should be sanctioned too then. Next question?
Let's not defend evil just because another evil bonked it on the head, shall we?
Yes abolishing of woman sports if that helps you understand it. We can easily redesign sports grouping - it's not nuclear weapons, not rocket science. It's easy.
No. Not as long as the artist gets benefits.
There are billions of meaningful ways to entertain yourself. Don't be a sheep - it's your world.
Change rooms should be unisex either way and professional sports is totally solvable - we already have weight classes etc but at the end of the day sports is just entertainment and not what we should be basing our society about. It can fuck off and disappear for all I care - plenty if other entertainment out there.
Give most of it away to free software foundation and put couple million to an low yield ethical index fund and start packing for some traveling.
Nope current discussion is social reaction and OP is conflating with government policy - not even remotely the same thing. It's a bad faith discussion that will go nowhere productive so have a day.