this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
415 points (98.6% liked)

News

36816 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in the Iran war has reportedly prompted internal talks about increasing supplies

Some Pentagon officials are concerned about the “alarmingly low” supply of Tomahawk missiles remaining in the U.S. military’s arsenal after firing 850 of the weapons into Iran, according to a report.

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, now in its fourth week, has prompted internal talks about increasing supplies, according to The Washington Post.

U.S. officials told the newspaper that the number of Tomahawks left in the Middle East was “alarmingly low.” Another official told the outlet that the U.S. supply of Tomahawks was closing in on “Winchester,” military slang that means almost out of ammunition.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

USA has nothing more than Money and resource. that is perfectly fine. Anyway American taxpayer will prever to stay hungry but keep feed the army

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Now they will print more dollars to buy some more Tomahawks and the world will bet on that dollar again. When it does this shit (USA) will collapse fast.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It’s so silly. Those were made to be used ‘surgically’: to hit specific high value targets at extended range while minimising collateral damage. If you feel the need to use 850 of them, you’ve chosen the wrong weapon system: at that point, you should be flying B52’s over whatever you want to hit. Or turn Tehran into a glass parking lot.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

who males the Tomahawk and are Trump's kids long that stock?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Raytheon (RTX Corp)

[–] theblurstoftimes@leminal.space 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is like when a noob uses a cheat code at the beginning of the game and still loses

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Invincibility cheat and then walk off the edge of the map so it doesn’t matter 🤣

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

those are about 3 million each, in pre trump funds. Looks like tax paying Americans will all be emptying or wallets and cutting services to replace those now too. I hope Israel is happy with us and sends our politicians a tiny fraction of that amount in bribes.

Btw only 9000 tomahawk missiles have ever been produced in the 43 year lifespan of the tomahawk program, and at top speed we can produce 600 a year. We usually make up to 90 a year. We reportedly had between 3-4000 in our inventory.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This is what scares me in a true protracted war with China. Imagine their production capacity. Even if our weapons are better, does it make a difference if they can build them 10x faster at 90% the efficacy?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You only need a few nukes to defeat all missiles China could produce in their entire existence. Any direct hot conflict with possibility of either side's total defeat would turn into a nuclear one.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

US army internal planning and table top runs show we run out of munitions for the high-high fight in days in a war with China.

It’s a documented and very real concern.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I always thought that was the point of nuclear bombs. You can attack me and you might even defeat me but it's gonna cost you. No need to have a lot of ammunition but a few that are very hurtful.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

If you kill me ill kill you right back.

Oh yeah? We just built more nukes than you we cna kill you 5 times.

Kill me 5 times? Watch this. I can kill you 50 times now lol.

50 times? Hah! Pathetic! Watch how I have the capacity to kill everyone everywhere a hundred times over!

Shit. Better build better nukes so I can kill everyone a thousand times over.

The worst is this is the most intelligent form of life in the known universe. This might be peak.

[–] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a gun nut or at all pro war, but why do they produce multimillion dollar missiles consisting of metal, fuel and explosives for that much for a one-way use instead of using that money to prevent wars? Well, call me a sweet summer child.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

Tomahawk missiles are meant to be used for high precision strikes, they're basically the missile equivalent of a 50. cal sniper loaded with AP-I rounds which is to say explosive but deadly if you want someone or something annihilated. Problem is they're using them like artillery or maybe a V-1 so of course it's gonna be fucking expensive for no reason, to go back to my previous analogy it's like using said sniper and ammo to hunt squirrels.

[–] billybob@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Are they doing this so they have an excuse not to help Taiwan next year?

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 5 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

If china get Taiwan the US is going into the stone age overnight. No president is trying to avoid this, both parties want to protect Taiwan.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 4 points 21 hours ago

Not after musk gets his super duper mega chip factory running.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

And what does Krasnov's boss want?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] poop@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

Or yet another excuse of why they can't help there own citizens. "Universal health care? You know how much that would cost???"

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

Those could have been used against russia to defend Ukraine...

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right… that’s the concern here… dwindling supplies.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine a world where the US ran out of bombs.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 21 hours ago

What did the US say at the end of the war? Iran out of bombs.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago (6 children)

That really is the best opportunity for China to take Taiwan. Wait a little bit longer until stockpiles are empty and ground troops are deployed and then strike while the USA is occupied

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

Why would China bother?

China is about to become what America was: #1 country, #1 economy, with oil traded in their currency, with resources available across the globe.

China's investments in Trump are about to pay off huge.

Why fuck with a winning hand by invading a small island when they can just keep doing what they're doing, and let Taiwan make semiconductors for China, and collect all the benefits of being Top Dog?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Taiwan might be asking to join China to protect itself from perceived American aggression at this rate.

[–] jellygoose@lemmy.ca 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Already kinda is, it feels like.

I’m Canadian; most people here seemed extremely happy to see our PM in China making actual deals and opening up trade.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

That's exactly why I am 99% sure that everything with Trump and the Republicans will eventually point back to China. That's who benefits from all the chaos, all the corruption.

Russia is a nice red herring, but China is using them and will discard them as soon as it is convenient.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly from a book of Sun Zu, sit back and watch your enemies fight with each other’s and you will win without shooting a single shot.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Do not interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

China supposedly now has a full copy of the Epstein files too.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

How could they have obtained this?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›