this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
416 points (98.6% liked)

News

36816 readers
2062 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in the Iran war has reportedly prompted internal talks about increasing supplies

Some Pentagon officials are concerned about the “alarmingly low” supply of Tomahawk missiles remaining in the U.S. military’s arsenal after firing 850 of the weapons into Iran, according to a report.

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, now in its fourth week, has prompted internal talks about increasing supplies, according to The Washington Post.

U.S. officials told the newspaper that the number of Tomahawks left in the Middle East was “alarmingly low.” Another official told the outlet that the U.S. supply of Tomahawks was closing in on “Winchester,” military slang that means almost out of ammunition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why would China bother?

China is about to become what America was: #1 country, #1 economy, with oil traded in their currency, with resources available across the globe.

China's investments in Trump are about to pay off huge.

Why fuck with a winning hand by invading a small island when they can just keep doing what they're doing, and let Taiwan make semiconductors for China, and collect all the benefits of being Top Dog?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

Taiwan might be asking to join China to protect itself from perceived American aggression at this rate.

[–] jellygoose@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Already kinda is, it feels like.

I’m Canadian; most people here seemed extremely happy to see our PM in China making actual deals and opening up trade.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's exactly why I am 99% sure that everything with Trump and the Republicans will eventually point back to China. That's who benefits from all the chaos, all the corruption.

Russia is a nice red herring, but China is using them and will discard them as soon as it is convenient.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is exactly from a book of Sun Zu, sit back and watch your enemies fight with each other’s and you will win without shooting a single shot.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Do not interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

China supposedly now has a full copy of the Epstein files too.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How could they have obtained this?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

hackers, they claim.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If that was true, why are they still saber rattling? Stupid dictators and bloodthirsty supporters lead to stupid wars, so I wouldn't count it out.

Look at Ukraine. Russia had already de facto annexed most of the land that they hold today. Ukraine wasn't willing to fight them to get it back. All of Russia's neighbors were too scared to join EU or NATO. Europe was dependent on Russian gas and vulnerable to Russian coercion.

Putin started the war anyways.

Four years later and hundreds of thousands of soldiers dead, and the economy is crashing. Ukraine is bombing the shit out of Russia and occupied Ukraine and trying to take it all back. Oligarchs are going poor/dying. NATO now has a much larger budget than the Russian military, arguably stronger than it ever was during the Cold War. Putin has no way out of this war, if he withdraws he probably ends up in the Hague.

If he had stopped after 2014, Putin could have kept everything, but he kept breaking the ceasefires and escalating.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because it costs them nothing to saber rattle?

What they're doing is working, so they're going to keep doing it.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Military equipment is not cheap, nor is flying jets into Taiwanese airspace. Also if you keep telling the population that you're going to invade Taiwan, then they do kind of expect it to some extent, even if the PRC is not a democracy.

Finlandization does have some benefits for the PRC, but I would not rule out a stupid land invasion of Taiwan.