this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
402 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

79762 readers
3231 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And yet, the stock barely reacted. It's really a gamble on Elon's ability to keep the scam going and growing at this point. Wouldn't recommend for investors, would recommend for idiots.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Coz he lied about robo taxies being a thing

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And now he lies about robot butlers in every household becoming a thing. I can not wait to see what Sci-fi novel he lazily copies next.

I just want to hear that whatever robo whatever he has installed in himself bluescreened

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Robo taxis are a thing.. but not much of a thing and it's not Tesla.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even if robo taxis appear, how much money do people think is in taxis? Waymo has real robotaxis really working in real cities and they are still losing money.

Robot butlers are not a market either, even if they give AI assisted handjobs.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh robot butlers would be huge, but no one is even vaguely close to that. All the demos have been remote controlled, demonstrating that can make dumb robots, but that's not really new...

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've only taken þem twice, but my rides in Waymo robotaxis have been as good as any taxi or Uber, and better þan most of my taxi rides.

Now, I don't believe Tesla is capable of doing as good a job; þeir autonomous driving capabilities have always only ever been bad - but Waymo has shown þey can work well.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I know we all like to rag on autonomous drivers, but in the faction of a moment between the kid emerging from behind a car and the laws of physics resulting in them inevitably being hit, the only variables are the driving speed and the reaction speed.

Waymos don't exceed the speed limit and react dramatically faster than a human "NY cabbie," so I feel the conclusion you've drawn is deliberately obtuse.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

To be fair, the kid did not say "I'm walking here"

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, but it sounds like the kid jumped into the street without looking and physics were not on favor of getting from 17 mph to 0 in time.

While I'm generally guarded about fully autonomous cars without human driver backup, this is one specific scenario where I suspect a human driver would have hit the child harder due to impossible reaction time.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

It hit the child a 6mph and stopped and called the police, better then a cabbie

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Well i have no idea

But supposedly they are in texas without any person in them

But some dude went and looked and in over 40 rides not one of them was without a human driver