this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
294 points (98.7% liked)

politics

27586 readers
3296 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 112 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

That's because it's a bribe, and not a documentary that's supposed to make money, lol.

"I’d be amazed if box office gets reported on this title," one industry insider told The Mirror, adding that the film’s distributors might be paying a fee to cinemas to screen the movie, an established practice known as “four-walling.”

Documentary filmmaker Stefano Da Frè, who was not involved in the film, told CNN that "data-driven" Amazon would not have invested that much expecting to lose money.

“With all their tools, all their AI, Amazon Web Services — they didn’t just come up with that number randomly,” Da Frè said. “They believe, through their metrics, that it’s worth that amount.”

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

“With all their tools, all their AI, Amazon Web Services — they didn’t just come up with that number randomly,” Da Frè said. “They believe, through their metrics, that it’s worth that amount.”

Having worked at Amazon for a couple years this is the most hilarious thing I've read.

If someone L10+ wants something to happen its gonna happen metrics be damned. Lemmings will fudge numbers and just make it work. For all the bluster about LPs and such it's a very top down culture and what VPs and above want they fucking get it.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago

He’s half right. Bezos is getting what he paid for. He couldn’t care less if anyone sees that movie.

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 47 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

40M is nothing to Bezos, and it's a good investment if it wins him a few favors from Trump.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Really depends whether Trump can handle the humiliation.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago) (3 children)

Personally, I was eager to see it and super pumped to finally learn more about this fascinating and enigmatically beautiful woman. But while I was waiting in line with hundreds of other culture lovers, George Soros came strolling along and paid each of us a thousand quid to go and watch something better instead. So I went to The Smurfs. I hear he's going to all the cinemas with these bundles of cash. Him and Obama, who was doing the next street.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 5 points 1 hour ago

SOOOORRROOOOOOSSSSSSSS!! gestures angrily at sky

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I bet if you posted this on truth.social, orange monkey would re-tweet you.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 hour ago

Without an /s tag I wasn’t sure if you were serious or not. /s

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

With narcissism, I think their goal is always both. They deserve the bribe and the adoration, in their minds

[–] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It shows a really quite astounding lack of self awareness to even think that it's worth having a premier in the UK.

Had she been even remotely aware of how we (I'm from the UK) feel about her husband over here, she would know that this was inevitable.

Her husband is universally despised in this country. Even by the Right.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 hours ago

She should be despised too, she's not a victim.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago

They believe they’ll get something back out of this via corruption for sure. 

I think ultimately Trump will blame Amazon for messing up the movie defeating the whole point of the exercise though. 

Amazon should have let Ellison’s companies make it because the backlash won’t have been worth it. 

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

As you said, it's only worth that amount as a bribe. Paying Trump directly would definitely be a problem if we had a functioning Supreme Court and Congress (or if he were a Democrat), but why not make sure that bribe has a thin veil of deniability by wrapping it up in a pretty package that's labelled "Movie."

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Apparently you can just give him a Rolex and a gold bar and it's all good.

[–] primalmotion@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. Get an idiot, add a full set of tools and chatgpt, and they will still do idiotic things.