politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Fuck ICE, but stop saying they aren't human. For one thing, their cruelty and depravity should stand as a reminder of what the worst of humanity is capable of. But more than that, dehumanization of one's enemy is the first step toward radicalism. How else do you think they came to have their own terrible views?
They weren't born like this. They were made this way.
I agree. The complacent myth that the Nazis were subhuman monsters and not people like us is part of what got us this resurgence of fascism. We need to admit that the worst people are more like us than we're comfortable with.
https://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/fascism-i-sometimes-fear.html?m=1
If it wasn’t for that click noice meme, I wouldn’t have clicked this. I wouldn’t have read all of this man’s thoughts.
To think he’s been blogging this whole time is unreal.
I don't approve of that kind of rhetoric as a general rule, but conflating calling someone inhuman for their cruel actions with calling someone inhuman for their perceived racial inferiority is incredibly disingenuous.
Is it though? One seems more morally justifiable on the surface, but both have the same end result of reducing someone to subhuman status. And that reasoning is almost exclusively used to justify treating people like subhumans.
I'm just saying, we can fight and denounce ICE without adopting their rhetoric and dehumanizing ideals.
Treating someone as subhuman is a wholly separate action from calling someone's actions inhuman. They are not mutually exclusive. I just simply can't agree that calling someone inhuman for their oppressive actions towards another human being is anywhere near the same level as calling someone inhuman for simply existing. I won't do either, but I'm not going to judge someone for doing the former, only the latter.
Yes, but one definitely leads to the other. The rhetoric informs the action; if one hears something enough times, they may eventually begin to believe it's true.
Fair enough, we seem to agree on the larger issue here so I won't force the argument. But perhaps you can at least agree that calling those oppressive actions inhuman is directly denying the fact that humans are perfectly capable of such great evils. Which, evidently, they are.
One CAN lead to the other, its not a foregone conclusion though. I think more often than not calling heinous actions inhuman is more a coping mechanism than anything, because you'd have to be a braindead moron to literally believe there aren't humans behind those atrocities.
Well this begs the question of whether or not radical actions are required at a certain point and where that point actually is. Surely complacency only gets more necks stepped on.
I'm not suggesting complacency; quite the opposite in fact. Rage against tyranny and do everything you can to push the fascists out of power. But never forget that you could have been one of them, had your circumstances been different. And never let yourself become their mirror image, because rhetoric like "they aren't human" is exactly how you get there.
They were born humans, but they've surely lost their humanity by now.
People don't stop being people just because they're terrible. That just makes them terrible people. Never forget that the capacity for evil lives in all of us.
Furthermore, the only real purpose of claiming someone has "lost their humanity" is as a justification for treating them as less than human. Which is precisely why you and I despise them in the first place.
In my culture, being a human and having humanity are two entirely separate things. So I think we agree for the most part.
And they can be made normal again
Something I struggle with is the fact most murderous Nazis went on to live normal, productive lives
Nuremberg Trials only prosecuted a relatively small number of top ranking Nazis. Many who weren't prosecuted were fervent supporters that killed for the party. Then after the war they went on to reintegrate with society
They lived as bakers, teachers, etc., as law-abiding citizens
It's hard to wrap my head around the fact people could spend a decade willing to commit atrocities. Willing to murder someone simply for their religion/ethnicity. Then they just soend the next couple decades baking bread like a normal person
I'm not saying anything is right or wrong with how that was handled. Just something I've been thinking about
Can they, though? How many of them actually changed, and how many simply went into hiding?
One of the biggest issues that led us to this point was the tolerance of the racist uncle, the antisemitic grandfather just because "he's from a different time" or whatever. Many of these people never changed, we just started accepting it when it was couched in the right social rules.
It's well known that Trump grew up around former Nazis and active white supremacists. His family's culture growing up was steeped in it.
One of the things about cults is that followers fall into a sunk cost fallacy that means that the longer they've been a member and the deeper in they are, the harder they are to get out until there's a line beyond which it becomes basically impossible. Because to admit they were wrong is to admit that their beliefs were wrong, that their actions weren't justified, and that they're not the good person that they think they are.
I am merely doing unto them what they have been doing unto us. The saying is "do unto others as you would have done unto you." I'm merely doing that, but from reverse.
Systematically exterminating the cockroaches that is ICE and Republicans might be how we get out of this pit.
I see, so you actually want them to dehumanize you? So you're supporting what ICE is doing?
Because the saying is, with emphasis, "do onto others as you would have them do onto you", i.e. in plain English, "treat others as you would like to be treated yourself". So if you dehumanize them, that means you must like being dehumanized yourself (at least as long as you apply the saying).
I think the saying that fits you more is "eye for an eye", just don't read what popularly comes after.
They should be shunned. All these voters too. Don't let kids or pets around them. Treat them as dangerous.
I'm merely doing unto them as they requested through their actions. Not doing so would be disrespectful and might cause ICE to shoot you got not complying with officer directives.
The golden rule can always use more enforcers
That's exactly the type of things I hear from ICE and their supporters
Treating the other side as inhuman is a necessity for commutting atrocities
Fundamentalists are the historical perpetrators of all atrocities: the crusades, witch hunts, slavery, Nazi shit. Maybe it's time to do unto them what they have done unto us.