this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
85 points (94.7% liked)
Videos
17520 readers
819 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean to be fair, that's how prison is supposed to work. Rehabilitate the person so after, they're fit to become a normal member of society again.
Of course, that's only the theory of a few enlightened people...
I agree this is how prison should work. However, in my opinion this is not how driver's licenses should work. I think it should be possible to forfeit any chance of ever driving again.
Roughly agree.
Loosely related, I’ve been thinking recently that we really need to make it harder to get and keep a license. I’ve noticed a lot of absolutely terrible drivers don’t even realize they are driving badly. If they had to, say, pass a driving test every 3-5 years then someone would force them to listen to exactly what they are doing wrong, and keep them from the streets until they fix it.
I wouldn't quite agree. Sure, a car can be used as a weapon, but that's not its primary function. I'm not aware of the exact case, but if prison rehabilitated him in a way that he no longer uses a car as a weapon, and that's his only driving-related offense, I really see no reason why he shouldn't get a driving license. Unfortunate as it may be, not being able to have a car is a severe disadvantage in a lot of areas.
I would agree with you if it was about a gun license. Having a gun is only useful as a weapon.
I don't know about England, but at least here in Denmark, many people who have served a sentence will get into a trade. Without a drivers license those jobs can be practically impossible to keep.
It seems only logical to me that if we have tests for people to earn the right to drive a car, then there should also be a possibility of forfeiting that right again.
I sort of get the gun argument but it's not airtight in my opinion. Guns too can be used in harmless ways (shooting as a sport) so by the same logic full rehabilitation would include getting a gun license back.
And sure not having a car can be a big disadvantage, but so is having a criminal record, and we don't stop jailing people because of that. Rehabilitation doesn't mean that all consequences of your crime are undone.
At least in my country, no one can know about your criminal record, so it's not a disadvantage. And it shouldn't be.
That is exactly how it should work and not nearly enough people recognize that. It's part of the social contract: You break the rules, you get punished. After the punishment, you are a full member of society again.
Otherwise you just get punished again and that should not be the case.