this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
301 points (99.0% liked)

Fediverse

39535 readers
1381 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just thought I'd note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goferking0 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Linking so people see it.

Isn't that something possible in any piefed spot not just the instance of the dev?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes. So? Piefed.ca is receiving the bump here. Other instances have turned it off.

You know Rimu made a thread in !piefed_meta@piefed.social so you can ask questions or express concerns.

[–] goferking0 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it's a piefed feature set.

Based on rimus responses here and elsewhere they do not seem interested in feedback.

Even in their comment linking to a thread saying they welcome it, they were attacking someone providing it

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where do you see that in the thread?

[–] goferking0 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here = comm

And https://lemmy.world/comment/21861362 which leads to

https://piefed.social/comment/9670365

Where both calls anyone but them looking at the code amateurs and can't understand people wouldn't provide feedback if thought bad things in code were purposely done as so many projects will do that

There’s no need to listen to rumors and amateur speculation when we’re right here and happy to help. Come on in, the water’s fine!

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This comment was a month ago, and he was aware of people heavily slamming his project and showing no interest at all in actually sharing it to him.

He isn't specifically "calling out" anyone directly. All he says here is that the stuff people are complaining about here have been on piefed and not hidden since day zero.

[–] goferking0 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notice the quote from them specifically saying everyone but us are amateurs.

He isn't specifically "calling out" anyone directly. All he says here is that the stuff people are complaining about here have been on piefed and not hidden since day zero.

Again he's linking to the thread calling out others for looking at the code.

And again most are pointing out how terrible the code is and how odd it is for some of the features to exist.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Amateur speculation". I've directly replied to many people who have made false conclusions about parts of the code they looked at, mostly notably the claim that continues to persist that lemmy.ml is also defederated out of the box based on a complete misunderstanding of a specific code snippet.

[–] goferking0 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Love that the respose ignores every point just deflects again to a completely different topic

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Saying some are doing amateur speculation is not the same thing as saying anyone who has issues are "amateurs".

[–] goferking0 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Except that is exactly how it reads.

ignore everyone else looking at the code because they're amateurs as we're the only professionals here

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's simply not how I read it at all. He's referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.

[–] goferking0 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn't review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.

Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I simply do not share this interpretation of his comments at all.

[–] goferking0 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I know, but you also can't see anything but positives from anything they do

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And I can say the reverse to you. You interpret every decision made in the worst possible light.

[–] goferking0 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because I'm a cynical pet and keep seeing odd decisions made along with language that 80% of the time points to bad things.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Having actually interacted with rimu more than you, I think it's reasonable I simply dismiss your position here.

[–] goferking0 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Which again doesn't change how others would perceive the language used.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Are you purely upset about the use of "amateur" here?

[–] goferking0 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No it's their stance anyone reading the code has to talk with rimu or there's no way the person can understand it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Its more one can ask and inquire here if they wish rather than snipe and spam it around the fediverse everywhere.

[–] goferking0 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Again it's behave as I want and you have to talk to me or it's bad.

Am I talking to rimu now? Or just pr team?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

"Behave as I want"? What? I think it's reasonable for a developer, any developer to not view those who, from their perspective, seek to denigrate their work, possibly in bad faith, across multiple places.

You are talking to Skavau.

[–] goferking0 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

So you do/can see the hostility from the language used. So piefed pr

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 36 minutes ago

No, I'm seeing hostility used from others across the wider fediverse. I don't think anything he said there was really specifically hostile at all in any thread. A complete reach.