8

On one hand, the environment on the other, the impoverished.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I am split on this to be honest. There is a point to be made about these mandates unfairly burdening the poor but the solution has to be better then just not doing anything.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Well the first directive they take issue with is a gradual switchover gift on gasoline to EVs for personal transportation, by 2035. The solution is to phase it in, such as over the next 12 years.

Meanwhile, assuming it’s similar to what we have in parts of the US, it only applies to new cars, and you’re free to continue running your existing gasoline cars as long as you afford to. The solution is to let people keep using their existing gasoline cars

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

NOTUSpolitics

123 readers
1 users here now

This is the place for anything but US politics.

Please follow the community guidelines and rules while also following these extra rules:

No posting anything only involving the United States of America. The US can be involved but must include at least one other nation.

Please only post things that are related to politics or news with political consequences

Posts can be news links, questions/discussions or really anything.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS