this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
348 points (99.4% liked)

News

34948 readers
2938 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The recent federal raid on the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson isn’t merely an attack by the Trump administration on the free press. It’s also a warning to anyone with a smartphone.

Included in the search and seizure warrant for the raid on Natanson’s home is a section titled “Biometric Unlock,” which explicitly authorized law enforcement personnel to obtain Natanson’s phone and both hold the device in front of her face and to forcibly use her fingers to unlock it. In other words, a judge gave the FBI permission to attempt to bypass biometrics: the convenient shortcuts that let you unlock your phone by scanning your fingerprint or face.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Legitimate law enforcement does every day what would be assault by anyone else. This isn't wrong because it's touching people, it's wrong because the law enforcement agencies are illegitimate, so all uses of their power are illegitimate.

[–] who@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

it’s wrong because the law enforcement agencies are illegitimate, so all uses of their power are illegitimate.

Ergo...

;)

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ergo saying "it's aSsAuLt" is missing the point and hysterical, preaching to the choir. Who cares if it's technically assault when done by Joe Public? That's not why it's bad.

We should focus on criticising what is bad, not technicalities that only matter because of other bad things we could be talking about.

[–] who@feddit.org 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Ergo saying “it’s aSsAuLt” is missing the point and hysterical, preaching to the choir.

You're projecting a lot of tone and intent that doesn't exist in my comment, nor in my view of the issue, and you're doing it with a hefty dose of snark. That's unnecessary, unhelpful, and unkind.

In future, you might consider multiple ways that other people's comments could be interpreted, rather than leaping to assumptions that give you an excuse to criticise them and control the conversation.

Be well. Goodbye.