this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
260 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

80475 readers
3744 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Software engineers at Microsoft are now expected to use both Claude Code and GitHub Copilot and give feedback comparing the two, I’m told. Microsoft sells GitHub Copilot as its AI coding tool of choice to its customers, but if these broad internal pilot programs are successful, then it’s possible the company could even eventually sell Claude Code directly to its cloud customers.

Guys? Are we going to have to rename Microsoft products from Copilot to Claude soon?

Microsoft Claude 365?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmr0x61@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think Microsoft, as they often do, see the writing on the wall—the AI bubble bursting soon, taking AI-only businesses with them. What I see in this is a play to, at best, buy some extra good will with Anthropic so they can be first in line for the acquisition when the latter are tanking, or at worst (and more likely imo), get them dependent on Microsoft for revenue so that they have no other choice to be subsumed by them.

But I’ve been wrong about most economic/political predictions I’ve ever made, so we’ll see!

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If there's any company that will survive the bubble, it's Anthropic. They're the only company with a product, a business model, and customers that see long-term value in it.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their product may be one of the best, but they are more expensive, and they have no hope of making enough revenue to float their business.

MS and Google float their AI with their other profits, so it can work as a business model.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

OpenAI is the one doing 800 billion dollar deals and buying all the memory in the world

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol. They made some "deals" based on hope and a dream. In reality they are still posting net losses.

By the way, I have the very best bridge in the world to sell you. Interested?

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I’m sorry if my comment came across as supporting OpenAI. That was definitely not my intention 😆

Point was that they’re spending trillions and crashing the PC parts market and still firmly in the second place

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there anybody left who thinks that openai is going to survive? I don't think it has 6 months of life left.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It’s a weird money circle where companies spend money they don’t have for products that don’t exist and the money just goes round and round.

At some point someone will come asking about where the money actually is.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 2 days ago

This is true. But remember that Microsoft has an incomprehensible amount of money and if the bubble bursts Anthropic may survive but not at the same value.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They are tiiny and losing money by the skip full.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I doubt Google couldn't easily kill Anthropic by expanding their Antigravity project.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Antigravity is only rarely useful in software development.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The same could be repeated verbatim for any other AI agent.

[–] MadPsyentist@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago

Its almost like everyone building this shit at one point in the past 5 years called themselves a "software developer" and might have a good insight as to what that job entails. Posibly why LLMs are kinda competent at the job of development, they are being built by 1000's of ex software developers.

Probably wont be good at law or chemistry because the people building it have a felon musk level of understanding about those jobs.