this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
306 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28031 readers
2781 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch delivered a sharp warning to President Donald Trump after a high-profile Republican loss.

In a new editorial, The Wall Street Journal warned Trump that a hardline immigration strategy promoted by top aide Stephen Miller is fueling voter backlash.

It comes after a Trump-endorsed candidate for the Texas state senate lost to a Democrat over the weekend.

Archive: http://archive.today/wvOA0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 109 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“How does a Republican lose by 14 points in a safe conservative Texas state Senate seat that President Trump carried by 17 points in 2024? Answer: When there’s a voter backlash against the Trump Administration, notably its mass deportation debacles,” the Journal wrote, describing the special election in Tarrant County.

It could also be the raping of children...

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doubt it seem like most maga are pro rape

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What bends eventually snaps...

One of these days it'll be like GW Bush and everyone is going to claim they never supported him and didn't really understand why the rest of the party did.

And it's going to happen in an instant.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Without the cult part of maga i would agree but the republican fear the monster they created and is private army of cultist too much to do or say anything.

As for maga themselves he could rape their own child in front of them and they will smile and clap hand to encourage him

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

...

Some of us remember what it was like after 9/11...

If you think this is a cult that's never happened before, you just don't remember what it was like back then. They didn't just have Republicans, they had 99% of the country.

If we can bounce back from that, we can bounce back from this.

Like, not saying shit isn't terrible right now, it is.

But c'mon, be realistic. Even the racism and bigotry was worse after 9/11

[–] asret@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

It was the American response to 9/11 that ended my desire to ever travel there. The latest bout of fascism just confirms it.

Get well soon.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We didn't bounce back from that. Obama renewed or expanded on the worst of bush's policies for another 8 years. We ratcheted hard to the right. Trump is a symptom of the illness we caught in 2001.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

The illness predates 2001. 9/11 was a result of Post WW2 foreign policy, remember! The US is an imperialist nation, fascism is imperialism turned inwards. This was inevitable all the way back to the nation's founding. The destiny was truly manifested.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if I fully agree. After 9/11, the conservative movement was attempting to change the consensus(Evil brown foreigners are coming to kill you and your family). The fact that a black man won the Presidency not once, but twice speaks to a failure to meaningfully change it.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

A black man who authorized more drone strikes on black and brown people than any other. Obama did a lot of fascist shit. Liberals really struggle to accept that fact because of dumb tribalism.

The other commenter had it right, I'm afraid.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just to add to your point, there's a documentary from around 04 or so called Jesus camp I believe where they honest to the gods prostrate themselves to a cardboard cutout of Bush. It's surreal and just made me want to kill the adults in it, if you want to watch a commentary on it The Bible Reloaded did a video on it years ago, also Jake and Hannah (went by Hugo at the time) are both still chill.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was younger but also not from the US so i’ve might have missed some on what was happening inside the USA at that time but i don’t doubt it was a real shit show back then

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It was bad and everywhere.

Like, right now America is like 20-35% Maga, after 9/11 it was literally 99% of Americans that were cool with anything Dick Cheney wanted. Absolutely zero accountability and a blank check against any citizen who wasn't fully behind the government.

Hell, I wore a "bad cop, no doughnut" shirt to highschool the year after 9/11, and got sent home for being unpatriotic. Even though no one could explain how that wasn't patriotic or why it would be an issue even if it was.

We were invading countries left and right and killing an insane amount of civilians in other countries.

The reason trump seems much worse right now, is because he doesn't have that level of support. That's why he's trying so hard to convince people we're under attack. He wants a 9/11 or 10/7 sort of event so he can get that 9/11 level of support. Then shit is gonna get real fucking bad.

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not from the US but I'm old enough to remember 9/11, and what's happening right now in your country seems waaaaay different from then. There was no ICE. People weren't kidnapped in broad daylight. Bush wasn't trying to subvert the electoral process. Minorities at large weren't explicitly targeted.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, the imperialism was happening abroad (war of terror) rather than domestically.

I was active on the internet around 9/11 and you truly wouldn't believe the scale and toxicity of the hatred pouring out of the US at the time. It was an everyday occurrance where someone would wholeheartedly endorse using nuclear weapons against random Arab nations.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

He don’t need the support he got fear and is own army in Ice ( and part of the US army )that wait just a word from him to start mass killing american he consider against him that why i thought it’s seem worst now but yet again i’m not in the US so i’m sure i don’t see or hear everything that’s happening ( trusted source are hard to find )

[–] braxy29@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... except W didn't support him?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They mean it's hard to find anyone who will cop to voting for W. Everyone in the United States thinks the Iraq War was a bad idea, and nobody supported it at the time if you take their word for it.

[–] braxy29@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

thank you for clarification!

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

I still have a "bush/cheney 04: destroying your rights one amendment at a time" bumper sticker on my truck, unassailable cred here