this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
261 points (99.6% liked)
news
664 readers
566 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
On his defense, there was apparently a 2 hour legal discussion on the topic. His statement was correct within the legal framework established. Out of context it sounded dodgy as hell though.
Yeah, I mean, at one point they were arguing over the legal definition of the word is, that soundbite wasn't from anything resembling a normal conversation.
But unless he takes the stand and drops a bomb on every perv he can, despite the risk of self incrimination, he can get fucked with the rest of them.
Fully agreed.
I'm the sort of person who wants people to be judged on their actual choices and actions, not those taken out of context.
The Clinton's going nuclear, in public, would be unlikely but amazing!
Hilary Clinton facing the first opportunity in her lifetime for people to like her.