this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
77 points (98.7% liked)
Linux
12714 readers
420 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You don't have to though? I use vanilla GNOME. Customization is never free, if you aren't using it it's just bloat and the more you add the more it slows down development.
The development of KDE doesn't seem any slower to me than Gnome. But it does support my workflow much better due to the customization options!
KDE is relatively smaller in scope than GNOME. Besides, GNOME has taken on its own hurdles like compatibility across devices, the userbase is also different so they're less likely to contribute towards areas like gaming for example.
What lets GNOME dominate developer wise right now are adwaita and the language barrier - KDE is mostly c++, whereas in GNOME you'll find a mix of languages and outreach programs like GNOME circle.
I'm not saying you're wrong on all or even most points, but just by itself this comment is basically a marketing post.
By what measure, and which parts of the projects are you taking into account?
KDE has also taken on its own hurdles. By the way, compatibility across devices is one of the best examples of feature creep if you don't need it, as most Desktop users don't!
Don't see how that's relevant to the development speed of the environments and their customizability.
Again, by what measure? Does it result in faster development of helpful features for my workflow?
KDE also has outreach programs, so this also doesn't show much.
We're 3 comments deep in a 20 hour old topic, nobody but us will be reading this.
I'm curious, do you have any links?