this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
360 points (88.5% liked)

politics

28242 readers
1650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Hydrochloric acid may have been a better choice, but some interesting studies have found sulfuric acid is second most effective.

Postmortem tissue alterations induced by corrosive substances – a scoping review

Another study on human tissues dates back to 2011, where a group of researchers in America, represented by Hartnett, Fulginiti and di Monica28 examined the effect of household substances on five types of human tissues, namely bones, teeth, hair, nails, and skin/muscle/adipose tissue. However, the specific number of analyzed samples is not specified. The study involved the use of seven different substances including: hydrochloric acid (31.45 %), sulfuric acid (95–98 %), caustic soda (100 %), bleach (5.25 % sodium hypoclorite), organic cleaning substance (bacteria and enzymes – no concentration available), Coca-Cola (unknown concentration of phosphoric acid) and water (as a control). The duration of the study ranged from a few hours to 30 days for the submerged group. The authors assessed the macroscopic appearance and samples weight and concluded that hydrochloric acid was the most destructive agent, with tissue destruction occurring in less than 24 h. Sulfuric acid followed as the next most destructive substance. No notable changes were observed in tissues submerged in water or organic cleaning solution

I've actually had a bit splash in my face while working in a lab. Luckily I was wearing safety goggles, but the tiny bit that did contact my cheek was quite painful and immediately did some damage. It doesn't seem inconceivable that they would attempt to dispose of evidence by sealing it in barrels of acid, including human remains that may have already been in the process of decomposing. It also doesn't mean it was the only thing used to conceal evidence. Definitely don't believe these people have done much to earn the benefit of the doubt.

It’s hard to believe that a bunch of billionaires on a private island with bodies to dispose of would chose that as a method.

I would say it's harder to believe a sex trafficking pedophile island run by a bunch of billionaires to serve the world's elite, ever existed in the first place, or that it continued operating for as long as it did while victims of trafficking were flown in to be tortured and as some witnesses have claimed, murdered. And yet...

If a scientist famously attempted to do it, not sure why you would think these people wouldn't?

Larissa Schuster, also known as “the acid lady”, utilized her knowledge as a biochemist and access to professional laboratory substances to dissolve her husband's corpse in hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sulfuric acid “The People V. Larissa Schuster.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

Definitely don’t believe these people have done much to earn the benefit of the doubt.

I'm not giving them the benefit of the doubt, even remotely.

I would say it’s harder to believe a sex trafficking pedophile island run by a bunch of billionaires to serve the world’s elite, ever existed in the first place

I don't find that hard to believe at all, that seems very consistent with the sort of things billionaires do.

If a scientist famously attempted to do it, not sure why you would think these people wouldn’t?

This is what you're not getting. It's not a question of whether they would or wouldn't do it based on morals. Absolutely no question that they would. The thing is they could've literally just dumped bodies into mass graves, what, are cops going to be snooping around? Or thrown them into the sea, whatever they feel like. It's purely a question of practicality.

There's simpler and more mundane explanations anyway, like desalinization. Again it's not a question of "giving them the benefit of the doubt."