this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
108 points (61.8% liked)

Comic Strips

22242 readers
1422 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

But if the answer to that is no, then by eating meat you’re responsible for the death of the animal you eat, plus all the insects that were killed to raise crops to feed it before you ate it. For something like a cow, they’re eating significantly more crops than you would because they weigh like 1000 lbs.

If the answer is yes, then don’t eat the cow, because as far as we can tell it has more awareness and capacity for suffering than a bug.

[–] redfish@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

take soy, as an example.

some 80%+ of all soy is pressed for oil, but a soybean is only about 20% oil anyway. that leaves 80% of 80% of the total crop as industrial waste. we feed that to livestock. (we call it soymeal or soycake). so no insects are harmed to produce that for livestock: they were harmed to make soybean oil. by feeding the byproduct to livestock, we are conserving resources.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

so no insects are harmed to produce that for livestock: they were harmed to make soybean oil.

Sorry, this is an accounting trick. The cows are still eating an agricultural product that killed insects, we can’t decide ‘oh, actually that’s entirely for oil’ if the soy meal is also valuable enough to sell and export as a product (about 65% of production, per the wiki article you linked).

There also aren’t any livestock that live entirely off soybean meal; a huge amount of corn is also fed to livestock. So even if you want to do shoddy accounting, they’re not being raised off waste and sunlight. A lot of crops are grown exclusively for livestock consumption.

[–] redfish@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

even the corn plant is a great example. people don't eat corn leaves, cobs, or stalks, but livestock eat silage made from them.

[–] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 5 days ago

Some can argue insects are more important to our ecosystem.

Either way, I have personally cut back on eating red meat. Been trying to cut back on meat altogether, but strictly for my health. At this point in the world, I don't have much hope. Climate change will dictate what we eat.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unless you consume the entire animal yourself and refuse to share, the math doesn't check out.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A cow eats more crops which kill more insects over its lifetime than you will by eating plants over the same period, because you eat fewer plants. There’s no way that adding entropy by eating something that ate plants somehow kills less insects, even if you want to take into account dividing up the meat between other people.

Example: steers eat 30-40lbs of feed per day for 1-2 years. Less than half of a steer is usable beef, and will give you a little less than 500 lbs of meat from a 1200 lb steer. Assuming 1/2 lb servings, that’s a little less than 1000 servings of ~500 calories for something that took years to raise and literal tons of crops like corn to be fed to it.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

My point is that is more than if one person consumes the animal the environmental impact should divided between the person, based on how large part of the animal they eat.