World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Don't worry..... Our next president will be a center right candidate and be declared both a rabid leftist and simultaneously the saviour of democracy. They'll only predator drone strike a few weddings, thus securing their Nobel peace prize. Everything will return to normal, with just a little shift of the Overton window to the right. But hey, at least it won't be Trump and full on fascism......
All sarcasm aside, the older I get the more headlines give me dejavu. I can remember article like this after the Gulf war where I felt like other countries were actually stepping away from America's lead, and then the Clinton's rose to power to make things better. Then Bush v2 and Afghanistan and then Obama promised to make it all better. Now we have trump and I'm beginning to wonder what kind of centerist compromise the Democrats are cooking up.
History may not repeat itself but it sure does rhyme, and seemingly the tune it does it to just gets worse every iteration.
Trump is incredibly different from everything in your lifetime. You either haven't been paying attention, or your a frog in a pot and just didn't notice the temperature rising.
For all of your life things just kinda worked out, things were never super great under either party but your country didn't collapse either. So you're expecting things to go on like that for the rest of your life.
History does indeed rhyme, but it's not rhyming with W Bush, or Obama or anything else in your lifetime. It rhymes with guys like Putin, Erdogan, Mussolini, and Hitler.
Trump is incompetent and a clown. But still he's doing a lot of damage because Americans won't stop him because of the false sense of complacency.
But while Americans stick the sand, the rest of the world is noticing. And we don't see Trump as the cause of the problems, he's a symptom of the rot in American culture. It's scary having someone as deranged as Trump in power. But even more scary is what may follow him. Trump is at the top of a fascist movement, but he's deranged and incompetent. The next leader of American fascism may not be so incompetent.
We all hoped you would just vote for the black lady and things would have indeed gone back to normal. But that didn't happen. Americans either voted for fascism or were complacent about it as you are. So now the world has to change. Trade will be routed around the US. Alliances with the US are just paper now, they're meaningless. The US will be isolated as Spain was under Franco.
You could've just voted in primaries and got some people in power that would tax the wealthy. The US is the wealthiest country in the world, just the wealth didn't trickle down as Reagan told you it would. But if you thought being a wealthy country with a population indoctrinated into apathy on wealth distribution was bad? What happens when that wealth just isn't there and you'll still have a population too apathetic to think about wealth distribution?
The US is fucked and the rest of the world is trying to distance itself from you before it all collapses. But go on and keep thinking everything is going to keep on as it always has.
Did you miss the part where I said worse....?
It has been in perpetual decline for decades. Trump didn't just happen overnight, nor will America be ghosted overnight, Empires die slow deaths.
Not a fan of Putin or erdogan..... But I think falsely conflating them with Mussolini or Hitler is a bit much.
Fascism is rising in all western democracies as a response to late stage capitalism. It's not inherent to America, nor is from a false sense of complacency.
Yeah..... I don't think the fascist movements ballooning all over Europe have been made aware they appropriating American culture.
Lol, who said I didn't vote for as you said "the black lady"?
I'm willing to bet the corporations in your country still care more about money than they do about policy. America still has a bunch of capital to swing around and in the end that's really what liberal democracies care about.
I think nations should boycot America, I just don't really expect them too.
When did I say I didn't?
Do you think everyone in America shares a hive mind or something?
Again..... What do you think everything progressively getting worse means? What do you think a "collapse" actually means? How exactly is a country like Canada going to shield itself from a collapsing America when America is by far its largest trading party?
If you think this problem is just in America, or that canda doesn't have a problem with income inequality.... I really don't know what to tell you. This is just what happens to any nation who bases their economy on the idea that infinite growth on a planet with finite resources is possible.
Americans expect a lot from their Presidents. But the real problem is Congress.
In the US, you need a super-majority in the Senate to pass any legislation.
The Senate size is so small that a single individual Senator has huge power. That create incentives for corruption.
Joe Biden tried to increase taxes on Wall Street. One single Senator, Kyrsten Sinema, sabotaged him.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/sinema-received-nearly-1-million-from-wall-street-while-killing-tax-hike-on-investors
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/09/how-wall-street-wooed-sen-kyrsten-sinema-and-preserved-its-multi-billion-dollar-carried-interest-tax-break.html
The Biden Administration introduce a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act to to bring down drug prices. Again. One single Senator was enough to weaken his reform.
https://www.salon.com/2021/09/23/big-pharma-firms-donated-750k-to-kyrsten-sinema-then-she-opposed-bill/
https://www.businessinsider.com/kyrsten-sinema-pharmaceutical-giants-campaign-donations-drug-price-reform-2021-9
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/11/big-pharma-has-a-powerful-new-shill-kyrsten-sinema-fighting-drug-price-reform
Sinema was never going to play ball, she made it clear the moment she was elected, she was pretty much poor like mtg and boebart before being elected, shes a millionaire from all those donations now.
Good points, but the contention between branches is just kabuki theatre. It’s fake bro. There are always a rotating cast of “spoiler villains,” and if too many of them are facing reelection then they just make something up like “senate parliamentarian won’t let them.”
If the Dem president actually wanted to get something done then he’d use the bully pulpit like Trump does to make it so. This happened approximately 0 times during Biden’s 4 year slumber.
I've always bought up this sort of thing; but I've had to rethink it... not thar its wrong, but the executive orders that this (and many other presidents) sign which starts massive changes that don't go through Congress completely short circuit the process. Even if they eventually get overturned, it's typically way too late to go back to what was. It's a short cut to get things done that isn't popular and wouldn't have passed as a bill.
Much like destroying the east wing, you can't ever get things back you lost. People lose jobs, land gets torn up, foreign trust gets destroyed... it so much easier to sign an executive order, make a change that destroys that which took decades to build and then have it overturned. Then you say "well, congress has that power not the president" but it's too late.
I mean it's definitely both..... Congress has empowered the executive to an incredible degree, and this has been rarified by the judiciary.
Plus, most people ignore most elections other than when electing a new president. So your presidential candidate has a huge influence over the makeup and political agenda of Congress.
Okay, but the reason we have had centerist presidents is because that's as far left as the people running the government and the media were willing to go. The voters are a symptom of that. That's why they're going after schools, you can't have symptoms that are smart to what's going on. Read anything about inside Korea, and they really love their dear leader if they're young because it's like a religion.
Eh... That's debatable. The modern democratic party being center right is kinda a byproduct of Thirdway politics. Which was largely popularized by the party leaders itself, specifically by the Clinton's.
Bill Clinton rose to power by advocating for compromise as a way to get through the growing gridlock in Congress. This worked for his career, but it gave the Republican party a huge amount of influence over defining what that middle ground was. They would work with Democratic candidates with policy that served their purposes and completely ignore the ones that served anyone left of center.
This had the overall effect of not only controlling policy in congress, but actually being able to vicariously control the opposition. As time went on the only people who reached seniority in the DNC were those who would compromise with the rnc to create a "mutually" beneficial policy.
Pretty sure that we're saying the same thing.
My point of contention is largely that the issue isn't with the will of the voters, and that the direction of policy is largely directed from the top down.
Most American progressives are vastly more progressive than their representatives. It's just that the DNC's leadership is filled with thirdway democrats who refuse to support anyone left of center.
Edit: just reread you original comment. I misread it the first time round and thought you had said it was as far left as the people were willing to go. My bad.
It's all good. I do that a lot myself, lol. One thing trump has shown and been extremely transparent about, is that the billionaires don't give one shit about us and they run everything.