this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
1462 points (99.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

4089 readers
1285 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@quokk.au 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I often wonder if DHS is aware of the threadiverse. I would assume so but who knows? At least I don't think our admins would cooperate with them for the most part.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

It's reasonable to assume the contents are being trawled in Utah, but most likely will only be looked at after trigger-words scare the AI in charge.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US law enforcement subpoenas data centers and servers often. For a physical server, the FBI will leave a windows sever running and gain access, if it is a Linux sever however, they will to confiscate the server. I'm not sure what they do for cloud hosted servers.

[–] LibertyLizard@quokk.au 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All the more reason to be on a non-US based server right now.

Worth noting that a lot of their subpoenas are BS though and could be fought successfully. Big tech is too scared to do even minor things to protect their users because the regime will retaliate in other ways that could cost them money. Small hobby servers don't have the same avenue of attack, although they might be more vulnerable in other ways.

[–] saplyng@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This. I work for a tech company that unfortunately gets quite a few subpoenas, from little police departments to the letter agencies, and I have pushed back on subpoenas and warrants that I felt infringed on peoples rights and "negotiated down" the scope of them. If a company isn't willing to try and keep their users out of the legal crossfire they're cowards.

Call me naive, but I trust my instance. I don't even agree with everything it stands for, but I trust the admin.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A server in .au is still part of the 5 eyes, so...

[–] LibertyLizard@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True... I guess I'm not too knowledgeable about the situation in Australia. How would the US approach them and what legal avenues for resistance exist?

They're not a fascist government but they also don't seem to have the same free speech protections the US does. Not that that has helped us much,

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes

We can't spy on our citizens, we'll just ask our buddies to do it for us.

[–] LibertyLizard@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

Spying is a bit different from being compelled to share data though. Probably everyone is vulnerable to secret surveillance, I'm not sure how to mitigate against that. But the information from such efforts will be more limited.