this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
250 points (99.6% liked)

World News

53977 readers
3036 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It's historical. Surnames in Europe weren't a uniform thing until the early 1800s under Napoleon.

An epithet like "of the house of Windsor" is approximately the same thing, and sure enough if they leave the royalty they usually take that as their surname (see also Harry, Prince of Wales, going as Harry Wales when he was in the military).

The point of a surname is to disambiguate between people (e.g. Mark, Jacob's son, or John, the smith). For a prince, if you say Harry you already know which one they're talking about, so they never needed to truly adopt surnames.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Tell that to Hatshepsut and the whole string of goddamn Thutmoses she had to put up with. (Yeah they had numbers but when you yell "Thutmose!" you don't really want all of them.)

And applying that to royals in general, if they're so unique they should be more creative with the names, dontcha think? So many Henrys and Louis