this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
318 points (95.2% liked)

politics

28561 readers
2418 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Idk about the Greens, but Biden had 6 Million more votes in 2020 than Harris did in 2024. That's a lot of abstainers.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay, take another step: how do you get those voters to have voted in 2024?

We're going to run two experiments, @FiniteBanjo@feddit.online , which will both start with the following premise:

It's August 2024, the night before the convention, and you are Kamala Harris's campaign manager. You are just coming off the big bump in polling you got from naming Tim Walz your vp. So far, your polling has been meteoric. You managed to got from the low forties high thirties to high forties in weeks.

You've got 1.5 billion dollars to spend, and a week of captured media going into the convention. You have three months.

The experiment (0, 1) is conducted by you answering the following questions follows:

0 You are not allowed to change the candidates policy positions. Explain how you would use 1.5 billion dollars and 3 months to win an election.

1 You are allowed to change the candidates policy positions. Explain how you would use 1.5 billion dollars and 3 months to win an election.

If you actually answer those in good faith, you figure out how to get those 6 million voters back, and perhaps also understand how to have not lost them in the first place.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe we could fight back against the constant feed of misinformation run by Republicans, Billionaires, and Hostile Foreign Dictatorships? Yeah, I think thats how we get those votes back. We need DNC boots on the ground, door to door deep canvasing. Volunteering for the DNC is the most successful strategy to get the GOP out of power. It's how we tax the rich, pass singlepayer, remove PAC money, punish bribery, and hold criminals at the highest level of government accountable.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You could at least pretend to try and answer the question in good faith.

You've got 1.5 billion dollars to spend: What do you do differently in the Harris campaign, if not change her policies, that causes her to win?

And if you can't propose a method to using the 1.5 billion dollar warchest to win without changing her policies then you have to concede that we were right.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Musk bought twitter for $44 Bn and idk how much TikTok costs the Chinese but it made $33 Bn in Revenue, the arbitrary $1.5Bn seems pretty inconsequential.

Personally I'd have done more grassroots organization, more paid and volunteer position openings, and remove that guy from the campaign team who said there wouldn't be an unrealized gains tax: that guy sucks. Definitely don't bring the Chenneys on stage.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally I’d have done more grassroots organization, more paid and volunteer position openings, and remove that guy from the campaign team who said there wouldn’t be an unrealized gains tax: that guy sucks.

Do you understand what a grass-roots organization is? By definition, you can't helicopter in and create a grassroots organization. Are you going to stand by these statements here, in good faith, and argue that if Harris did these things, she would have won the election?

Because this looks like some thin ass bullshit. Tittering around the edges. I think you need to face reality.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Grass Roots means organizing from the bottom up. Bernie Sanders is often cited as a perfect example of Grass Roots, his campaigns are run by his team and the cooperation of many small groups and individuals, and likewise his funding comes from mostly small amount individual donations.

I'm not sure if she would have won if she had done those things, as I mentioned earlier the cards were stacked against her, the billionaires and foreign powers bought this election.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Grass Roots means organizing from the bottom up.

So you wanted a 1.5 billion dollar campaign to be something it wasn't? If you think a grass-roots campaign was what it was going to take to stop fascism, then you HAVE TO recognize that supporting Biden and Harris was a mistake.

If not you need to take another swing at bat for what the campaign, a real campaign, the one that happened in the real world, could have done differently OTHER than changing its policies, to win the election.

Otherwise you must concede that it was the failure of the campaign to change its policies which lost the election.

You've got 1.5 billion dollars to work with. SURELY you can come up with something.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You didn't specify where the money came from.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Jfc you really are putting some effort into spinning your wheels on this one. I'll be using this as an example of you not engaging in good faith in the future.

[–] goferking0 1 points 2 days ago

I'll be using this as an example of you not engaging in good faith in the future.

Good thing the mods on lemmy world actually do something about those type of users. Oh wait no that's only if not parroting the dnc lines

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I could take any one of your comments to use as an example of that, so fair game.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I could take any one of your comments

No you cant. Don't lie. I've called you out on this before and you can never put up. In fact, do it now. Go find a bad faith effort on my part. Comment history is right there, fascist.