this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
316 points (95.1% liked)

politics

28531 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I voted for them for tactical purposes. Both because at the time I cared about the well being of my fellow human beings and I care about my own well being. These days I'm not so sure I care about humans or even myself. I'm still grappling with the point of it all now that we're doomed.

I understand that tactics aren't likely your strong suit, so let me make it clear: I do not have to love the democrats as a party to vote for them. I just have to have a basic grip on reality that it was either them or fascism. Because its first past the post we are dealing with.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well then tactically you fucked up lol

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You either don't understand what tactics mean or you have some really Pepe Silvia shit to share with me.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You voted for genocide and still lost. Tactical and strategic woopsie.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So you don't understand what tactics are. Or at least are pretending not to.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. How was this successful tactically?

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Tactically, it meant I reduced the risk of Trump winning. Him winning doesn't mean abstaining from voting would have achieved that end better.

You think this is some kind of gotcha, but you are still just demonstrating a lack of understanding of what tactic's mean. You can make tactically sound actions and still lose you fucking idiot.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a "gotcha". If your goal was to vote out trump, you failed. That tactic did not work. How you evaluate that as tactically sound, I'm not sure.

Furthermore, I think your tactic leaves you in a strategically untenable situation.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The alternative tactic... also would have resulted in Trump winning.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

So maybe you should try something else

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone has lost, and there's more genocide.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well there's the same amount of genocide. But yes, we agree, and that means voting this way was a tactical and strategic failure.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Same amount in Gaza, more in the US.

[–] Arcadeep@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah yes, because giving Trump the win instead has ended genocide and improved the lives of millions

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Jfc you idiot. YOU STILL GAVE TRUMP THE WIN!!

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am saying that objectively looking at the outcome of the election means that running and supporting a pro genocide campaign was a tactical and strategic failure. You shouldn't do that in the future.

[–] Arcadeep@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh. Yes, agreed

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it was either them or fascism

Who do you think helped prop up and build the foundations for fascism? That's what your tactics resulted in.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

There are many ways to interpret this response. Some are reasonable (HRC did pied piper because she thought it'd help her win) and some are unhinged and stupid (Liberals are fascists).

My tactics were to vote in primaries (when they were available...) for progressive dems. I voted for Bernie Sander's twice. But then I voted HRC and Biden, and Harris when they were the liberal slop candidates that we got. Because the alternative was helping a fascist win.

My tactics were to canvass, advocate, donate time and money to progressive causes. And when the progressives did not fucking win the primaries, I gritted my teeth and did the same for the centrist dems.

And you know what, sure. Those tactics failed, because US citizens on average are completely selfish and stupid pieces of shit. I don't owe your glorious revolution my life. I did not choose to be here in this hellscape, that your own advocacy helped create.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

So you did what they wanted you to do, vote for the sheepdog in the primary to give you the illusion of choice and progress, they push the sheepdog aside and you are forced to vote for the candidate they wanted you to vote for from the beginning.

The only failed tactic is liberals using the same failed ones over and over, thinking this time has got to be different.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You should evaluate your tactics and evaluate the limits of electoralism then. And you should adjust accordingly.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I am not going to fight and die in your stupid dumb fuck revolution (that will happen any day now I'm sure).

My tactics have changed: Understand that I can't fix things. That I am wasting my short life trying to. Its time to seek the most pleasant oblivion.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

The revolution is going fine. 2 years ago around here, and on all social media, Democrats and Biden could do no wrong. Biden could provide the weapons to kill 10k children and Dems would still back him. Fast forward their polling numbers are in the tank, public acknowledgment that the party and it's candidates are shit and they are tired of the same old failed policies and tactics. 'Lesser evil' is unacceptable because it's not lesser.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

My revolution? No one is advocating for a glorious revolution. You're learning about the limits of electoral politics in a capitalist system. Your solution to this is to give up? That's your right if that's what you want.

But I don't think you'll actually have a choice about dying in this way.

And I think if you're going to just give up then telling others how to vote is pretty rude.