this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
173 points (98.3% liked)
Not The Onion
20552 readers
917 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Shocking take from a microsoft employee making a public statement. I had thought their leadership were all aboard the moron express to slopville.
Edit: I'm not saying I believe her. I think it's surprising that, even if lying through their teeth, any MS employee would say this publicly given that it runs directly counter to MS's messaging on AI.
100% Bullshit
Behind closed doors and away from the press they are going to be all in on the AI slop.
Sure, but I'm still surprised a microsoft employee would say something like this publicly given the company's apparent need to shove LLMs and generative slop into every nook and cranny in their products.
This is such bullshit. AI has only really invaded gaming in the past couple of years, but she makes it sounds like AI (in its current iterations) has been around been around forever.
I think they're using AI as the umbrella term there, rather than referring to LLMs and generative slop. The term has been used to mean many different things over the years, including the decision trees that drive npc movement and action.
Yeah, that's dishonest and malevolent or straight up negligent and ignorant
You think she currently works in the walking programming dept of Microsoft?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation
Don't misunderstand me- I fucking hate LLMs and generative slop. I'm not commenting on whether the statement was made in good faith (I doubt it was), I'm just pointing out that we've been using the term "AI" as a descriptor of npc behavior for decades and it's disingenuous to suggest otherwise.