this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Hardware

6409 readers
123 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung's Galaxy S26 series is available for preorder today and ships on March 11.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 days ago (4 children)

There's no way I would ever pay $1300 for a phone. I could buy a new HF radio for that, use it for 20 years then sell it for more that half of that. The phone will be worthless after a couple of years.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I am on the S22 which is now 4 years old and as you say worthless. The only thing i can say is yeah the phone may be 1k or more but i would hope nobody is buying it at retail. When i got this one it was 1k, but my phone trade in brought it down to $500 and they offered a deal that added another $100 off by doing that so it was only $400. I hope i can continue buying new phones every 4ish years around the $500 mark, definitely won't go higher myself.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

Especially when you can buy really great (arguably better) models from Samsung's own A Series lineup for like $400.

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

That's why I buy them used a few years after release. No reason to create more e-waste plus they're still premium devices even if two or so years have passed. That being said, Samsung began enshittifying their phones generation after generation.

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I've been buying mid-range devices since mid 2010s (Nexus 5, Xiaomi Mi A1); mid-range devices were fine then and even more so now. The one drawback was camera quality, but IMO this has been resolved. These days I stick to the Samsung A series. I bought my A73 in mid 2022 and I see no reason to upgrade (although battery charge is starting to become an issue, although it's manageable). It's too bad Samsung sunset the A7X series.

I can't imagine spending more than $500 - $600 on a smartphone (and even that is pushing it past the optimal spot on the price to performance curve).

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago

My last two phones were around $250 and have done everything I need. They have SD card slots, headphone jacks and physical sim cards which the higher end phones are lacking. I don't care about camera quality. I have a nice DSLR if I need good pictures.

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The only problem with Samsung A series is that the phones are huge. Phones the size of base S model are rare. Beyond Samsung S series there is only Pixel (which has its own issues) and some Chinese models.

I am one of those people who likes huge phones, even back when they were called Phablets (I also had company provided Note 3 and aNexus 6P).