this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
140 points (96.7% liked)
Linux
63387 readers
722 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As a reasonably new Linux user, who's merrily used Kubuntu for the past year, what makes Ubuntu sucky? Aside from dabbling in Asahi and a little bit of Arch, just to see why everyone loves it (I don't think my use-case is advanced enough to really tell the difference), my only real experience with Linux has been Mint and Kubuntu, both of which have been fine for me.
This isn't a bad-faith query, btw, I'm genuinely interested in what the actual differences are between Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora.
There's nothing I can say to convince you Ubuntu is sucky if you don't personally experience problems with it/have the occasional "I wish I could do this, but I guess it's not possible" thoughts—spoiler: it's usually possible, just not with that distro; this is true for all distros though, there will always be things they cannot do that others can.
That being said, my biggest gripe with Ubuntu, besides canonical's geologic-paced attempts to make it profit-driven (which was what I was thinking of when I mentioned user-friendliness), is Snaps. I understand the motivation behind them, but the implementation was just sucky for many nitpicky reasons that I don't really care to enumerate rn.
I also just don't see much value in downstream for my needs. I can basically turn Debian into a Ubuntu clone if I want to, and my packages will still largely be supported by upstream maintainers. For bespoke distros it makes sense, but those are usually ill-maintained or hobby projects that update at glacial speeds.
I'm not saying that Debian >>>>> Ubuntu. It's better just enough that I'd recommend Debian before I would recommend Ubuntu.
For what it's worth, I was planning on reinstalling my home server because I put Mint on it a year ago and I kinda feel like I've outgrown it. So it's now running Debian.
It obviously feels a lot more useful than Mint, but feels basically the same as my Kubuntu machine, largely because they're both running Plasma.
People don't like Ubuntu because they're(Ubuntu) trying to make money with it. For end users, it's can be a non issue because "pro" is free for 5 computers. But seeing the paywall for some is really off putting to some (myself included).
Snap really sucks and is Ubuntu's attempt at a private garden. I hate it so much.
But yet I still use Ubuntu because it works, and if it doesn't work there's a post somewhere with details on how to fix it.
I've been using Linux off and on since Red Hat 5.2 ish era. I can handle the tech geek stuff. I just don't want to.
+1
Hate pro, but more than that - hate Snap! Switched to Mint and couldn't be happier, it was seamless. I already only use none of Ubuntu defaults, so switching to mint and copying my dotfiles was almost as if I didn't even do anything. On my other machine, I just uninstalled Snap, which is close, but I feel like switching to Mint entirely would be even better. I just can't bring myself to backup everything to do a fresh install.
I just deal with snap and don't use it unless I have to. The pro thing is kind of stupid. I have 6 computers and vms on pro. There is no actual check preventing it from working. They have some bug where it appears like your have double the computers checking in sometimes. So when I had 5, it'd show 10 sometimes. So now it just shows 6 or 12.
Everything works fine. I'm ignoring it for now.
Someday I'll switch, but until that day, I'm chillin'.