this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
521 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

46649 readers
1179 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Telegram is not a private messenger. There’s nothing private about it. It’s the opposite. It’s a cloud messenger where every message you’ve ever sent or received is in plain text in a database that Telegram the organization controls and has access to it”

“It’s like a Russian oligarch starting an unencrypted version of WhatsApp, a pixel for pixel clone of WhatsApp. That should be kind of a difficult brand to operate. Somehow, they’ve done a really amazing job of convincing the whole world that this is an encrypted messaging app and that the founder is some kind of Russian dissident, even though he goes there once a month, the whole team lives in Russia, and their families are there.”

" What happened in France is they just chose not to respond to the subpoena. So that’s in violation of the law. And, he gets arrested in France, right? And everyone’s like, oh, France. But I think the key point is they have the data, like they can respond to the subpoenas where as Signal, for instance, doesn’t have access to the data and couldn’t respond to that same request.  To me it’s very obvious that Russia would’ve had a much less polite version of that conversation with Pavel Durov and the telegram team before this moment"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Pretty sure signal is not the best option, but telegram should be avoided at all costs.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

How is signal not the best option?

[–] privatepirate@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

Signal is good because it is easy to get others on board because of its simplicity, while having good encryption and security. However, SimpleX is just a better option. No phone number required, the same encryption, you can make a new profile whenever you want and you can have however many you want at a time. The groups can hold thousands of people. You can have it automatically make a new anonymous profile for you for each contact and group so that you can't be tracked across them apart from your writing style. There are no usernames, you add each other through links, which can be temporary or permanent, and you can add or remove a link whenever you want.

Sorry for that big wall of text, I just spat out all the things SimpleX is better for. I think that it's platform is the future.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Tbf, there's options that are just as secure and don't require a phone # to register, but that doesn't make Signal bad

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca -4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Signal does not require a phone number to register anymore, afaik.

[–] Matt@lemdro.id 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Signal still requires a phone number. What was added is usernames for contacts, so you no longer need to give other people your phone number for them to contact you. It is a step in the right direction, but it would be great for them to get rid of the phone number requirement all together.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Ah thank you for the clarification!

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

it does at least on android, you don't need to share it tho, there are usernames now

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Why do you say signal is not the best option? My only discomfort with it is the phone number requirement (and I think they maybe relaxed that)

[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Phone number requirements + afaik servers are in USA + it was some cryptocurrency related story (they tried to add some crypto wallet at some point)

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 33 seconds ago

afaik servers are in USA

You mean one of the few countries not currently trying to dismantle encryption?

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, you can make payments with MobileCoin. 🤮

Luckily, Signal does give you the option to completely ignore it. I only see it mentioned in the settings and I have not enabled it.

Same with stories, you can enable/disable them. Although, if I want to convince my normies friends to look at Signal using stories probably helps that. 🤷

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Ah I am not bothered by the cryptocurrency … thing. It’s pretty well buried in the app, and doesn’t seem like anything they’re particularly trying to push. More like a failed experiment.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's important to remember that for a lot of programs that have some tangentially related crypto feature, crypto used to be popular. It still is popular in some circles. There was a time when it made sense to include those features because users were asking for it. So time, money, and energy was spent to add those features.

What do you expect them to do with those feature now? You really think they're just going to delete them? Why would they remove an already developed and implemented feature? They hurt nothing. People don't have to use them. Them existing doesn't take anything away from the app functionality.

It's like being upset that old car models weren't recalled to remove ash trays and cigarette lighters when smoking became unpopular.

[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's not the wallet itself that bothers me (it is these days equivalent of adding some ai feature), but the story behind their involvement with and promotion of a particular blockchain or coin . Frankly can't recall all the details .

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Damn near everyone was making a coin at some point. Again, why would they remove or get rid of a feature they spent time, money, and energy to develop when it doesn't hurt anything by being there. In fact, they'd have to spend more time, money, and energy to remove it than if they just left it in place.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 hours ago

Supported by US nasty agencies.. They do NOT care about any-ones 'privacy' and would only support if they have another purpose or a way in..

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean? ~~DoD~~ DOW uses it, it must be super secure /s

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

It is as long as you pay attention to who is in a group chat