this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
582 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25445 readers
944 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most bridges here do, and often when one needs to be demolished and rebuilt, the military blows it up just for practice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The sapper units train how to blow up every bridge in their deployment area. Sauce: was in one

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

So did you do it by hanging shit off the walls or actually putting explosives into structures?

Everything I find about the defensive strategy talks about "charge pits" and "cavities", can't find a single reference to hanging or hooks.

As a dapper you'd use whatever means at your disposal, but as a defensive strategy you're doing with time, why wouldn't you actually make pits to put rhe explosives in? I'm sure as a sapper you understand how much more effective it is to have an explosive surrounded by the structure instead of just vaguely close to it, so that a majority of the explosive force actually goes into whatever you're blowing up instead of harakoille. Right?

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Directional charges are a thing

Bigger bridges have … crawlspaces you can set stuff in

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah.. so you'd agree it would be these hooks you'd use?