Funny

14148 readers

327 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

859

Just so there's no confusion (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HeurtisticAlgorithm9@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So I can imagine what you are describing, that is not the issue. It's just that I would not call that a chicken egg. And I could imagine a world in which it would be, but that's then not where we reside so it's not relevant.

Definition of an egg: an animal reproductive body consisting of an ovum together with its nutritive and protective envelopes and having the capacity to develop into a new individual capable of independent existence.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

That's the definition of an egg, not chicken egg.

There is no universally accepted definition, that defines it by the creature that laid it or the creature that hatches from it.
If there was, this dilemma wouldn't exist and there wouldn't be any debate.