this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
169 points (98.3% liked)

Privacy

4140 readers
400 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Computer scientists are campaigning against the global march toward age checks online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Shortening computer scientists to just scientists feels... Wrong

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 7 points 17 hours ago

Probably because a good chunk of "computer scientists" are actually engineers. I say this as a computer scientist in the engineering college of my school

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Most computer scientists have very limited expertise, none of which concerns human society. We might as well survey plumbers for their opinions.

Fun fact: did you know that the average CS major scores worse on reading and writing than a business major?

Imagine that level of cognitive decrepitude.

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 2 points 46 minutes ago

Who hurt you lmao

In all seriousness, there should be a control for liberal arts education. Computer Science is a specialized and rigorous field. If it's taught as the sole subject of a person's education, of course they are going to miss a lot compared to a degree in the arts. Meanwhile, as a computer science student at a liberal arts college, I'd wager I can communicate just fine.

Further, this chart feels disingenuous here due to your use of it to seemingly attempt justifying a cause-effect relationship where only correlation exists. Of course Computer Science students perform poorly in reading and writing compared to Philosophy and English majors. People who like reading and writing gravitate towards those majors, so they naturally will have a higher population of good communicators. The real issue is the failure of primary education in its attempt to train the general populace to read and write with any reasonable level of proficiency.

Also, since when are reading and writing the test of a person's cognitive function? Some of the most genuinely intelligent people I know couldn't write a good analytical essay if their life depended on it. Everyone has different strengths; for Computer Scientists, those just happen to be mathematics and deterministic logic instead of interpersonal communication. I don't get where the hate is coming from.

P.S. I'd read the study but the image is too low-res to make out the URL

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The same could be said of sociologists and plumbers. Sociologists know about people and society, plumbers know about plumbing, and computer scientists know about computers.

With a topic of computers and society, like this one, they each have insight on the situation. I would hope getting them in a room together would lead to solutions less harmful than what's been proposed thus far.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What about cognitive understanding because those are very specific fields that logically wouldn't be the strong focal points for cs professionals compared to the other professionals in the chats?.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Do you read what you write?

cognitive understanding

as opposed to noncognitive understanding? Wtf are you talking about?

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for

Most computer scientists have very limited expertise, none of which concerns human society

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 7 hours ago

Do I have a source for the fact that computer scientists have no specialized training on topics outside of computer science? (In addition to being apparently illiterate on average, which is what their performance on the GRE implies.)

Fascinating question. Have an upvote.