this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
158 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

4140 readers
432 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Computer scientists are campaigning against the global march toward age checks online.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

ok, everyone, set your age to be 69. if everyone is 69 no one is 69.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I wish parents would just step up and take responsibility for their own children instead of making the rest of society deal with it

[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's not the parents, but governments using 'protecting the children' as an excuse to push internet surveillance laws.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Yes, I know. I was being facetious lol

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

Sadly, not enough do, they prefer someone else be to blame, my gfs eldest daughter does do this with her son. Limited screen time, monitored PC in the family room with the screen visible. When she finally lets him run fully free online he will be mature enough to deal with the bs out there, we hope. If more parents did this the "Protect the Children" fallacy would be taken for what it is, surveillance, data mining, and control.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 14 hours ago

Meanwhile, said parents are both taking second jobs to afford rent.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think parents, most of who have a job and don't keep their kids under surveillance 24/7, can hope to compete with dozens of corporations with whole teams dedicated to making their platform addictive. I view the parental responsibility in the same way I view carbon footprints: a way to shift blame from corporations to individuals. I think this view also leads to individual-focused solutions that surveil people (age checks, etc) rather than systemic ones that regulate corporations.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Agreed. They need to direct their ire toward the corporations instead of my (and everyone else's) freedoms.

I said this somewhere else, but I was just being facetious. I think it's funny to turn the conservative mentality against conservative movements lol

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

This has literally never happened a single time in all of human history.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Shortening computer scientists to just scientists feels... Wrong

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 5 points 14 hours ago

Probably because a good chunk of "computer scientists" are actually engineers. I say this as a computer scientist in the engineering college of my school

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Most computer scientists have very limited expertise, none of which concerns human society. We might as well survey plumbers for their opinions.

Fun fact: did you know that the average CS major scores worse on reading and writing than a business major?

Imagine that level of cognitive decrepitude.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The same could be said of sociologists and plumbers. Sociologists know about people and society, plumbers know about plumbing, and computer scientists know about computers.

With a topic of computers and society, like this one, they each have insight on the situation. I would hope getting them in a room together would lead to solutions less harmful than what's been proposed thus far.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What about cognitive understanding because those are very specific fields that logically wouldn't be the strong focal points for cs professionals compared to the other professionals in the chats?.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Do you read what you write?

cognitive understanding

as opposed to noncognitive understanding? Wtf are you talking about?

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for

Most computer scientists have very limited expertise, none of which concerns human society

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 hours ago

Do I have a source for the fact that computer scientists have no specialized training on topics outside of computer science? (In addition to being apparently illiterate on average, which is what their performance on the GRE implies.)

Fascinating question. Have an upvote.