this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
800 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

82295 readers
5133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn't that depend on google play services? If so, "probably not, but then again it works currently if you install play services on a separate user profile (or on your main, defeating the purpose of grapheneOS to begin with but more power to you)."

Tell google/banks to stop requiring the spyware, they won't but at least it's better then telling the secure OS to install just a little spyware just so you don't need to carry a wallet.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I would still need to be able to use my banking app to check my balance. That's more than just needing "to carry a wallet." That's the difference of more than $450 in mistakes as that's what happened when i didn't get a live-update to my account prior to the advent of smartphone banking apps. Fuck 5/3. -a dumpster-fire of a banking organization if i've ever seen one.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

graphene still sandboxes gplay, even if you use the two profiles for work and home

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I think he was saying that installing it on your main user account would be the way that's pointless.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

and i'm saying it's still sandboxed on the main account leaving a second profile still available for work

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I guess I'm confused on how t being sandboxed would stop it from doing it's tracking thing

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

It gives you more control over when and what Google can do on the device. If you run Google software with network access you have to assume they can track you, but having it sandboxed minimizes what it can do while running and gives you more control over what it does (e.g. you can deny it network access entirely whenever you want).

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 hours ago

it has MUCH less access to your phone on GrapheneOS than stock android and can even be limited to only contexts where its required.

plus Graphene still blocks a lot of the other attack vectors that corporations use to track you like Dynamic Code Loading and Memory Tagging. to say installing google play services to your main profile defeats the purpose of GrapheneOS is to ignore like 80% of what GrapheneOS does and how it installs google play services

[–] BaroqBard@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

It'll still try, it just wouldn't have root access. It would just depend on what you allow it access to.