this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
-191 points (8.7% liked)

memes

20410 readers
1456 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Software dev here. I am good at it, and people pay me unreasonably high rates to come in and do things faster and better than they can.

It AI coding tools were useful, I'd use them.

AI slows me down twice:

  • 60% productivity loss whenever I try to use it for anything else than a code search engine.
  • When I have to follow up the -1x engineers who are using AI to become -10x engineers.

I have yet to see an AI adopter who actually gets shit done in a way that is meaningful to anyone exept their own psychotic selves.

"With Claude I managed to do this in one hour!" Bro, what you did was generate 120 lines of Javascript that badly reimplements what could be a single line of CSS. You could have used that hour to learn some CSS.

"Without AI coding tools, our team would have taken at least a month to make this barely-working standalone image upload page." My brother in Christ you are proudly yelling at me that you are fucking incompetent! A webdev worth their salary can shit out something better than that in their lunchtime bathroom break!

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago

-1x engineers becoming -10x engineers really made my day. Thanks.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Only the most incompetent people seem to be impressed by what LLMs shit out. AI bros are really annoying, but I take great pleasure in knowing that they are fucking dumb.

[–] MSBBritain@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, I use AI for coding the way I used to use Stack Overflow:

Find me code examples, explain an error or give me some summaries of how something should work but then I go confirm that or test it separately!

I never trusted Stack Overflow for anything more than pointing me in the right direction for what to research. Documentation links, snippets, blogs etc, that sort of stuff. As long as I tell the AI to give me a reference, about 60-70% of the time I'll get something I can actually use to confirm the code it gave me or get an answer for my question. At best what it does is save me googling time.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At best what it does is save me googling time.

At the expense of vastly higher resource use.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I value my finite time more than I value a few Watt-Hours.

You could go to your local library and read through a bunch of books rather than using Google if you're interested in more power savings ideas.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

60% productivity loss whenever I try to use it for anything else than a code search engine.

Even I as amateur Python dev am able to notice this. It's basically a nicer (and more resource-intensive) StackOverflow for basic questions when your brain lags again or you're stuck with how a library is documented (looking at you GTK). The best thing you can do with LLMs is not integrate it into your IDE but just have it open in a browser tab, and never ever copy anything out of it. Saves money, time and IQ points.

Also worth mentioning: It's extremely noticeable how different US companies tuned their models (unfortunately chinese models widely copied them). I was curious due to the whole Digital Independence things going on in the EU and did some tests with Mistral (EU) vs. ChatGPT (US).

My core takeaways:

  • Mistral refuses to open any website that tells LLMs to fuck off (it's sad this is even noteworthy, but all US companies just work around every block). This isn't an issue if you host your knowledge DBs yourself.
  • Mistral will more likely tell you "I don't know", "This might be incorrect" or "you should double-check this" if it can't find any resources on the question. ChatGPT instead will instead answer something as confident as always and hallucinate while coating you in honey.
  • Mistrals WebUI isn't infested with invasive Javascript. And as a sidenote, the European model also refuses to generate any pixel slop even in the style of smaller artists. ChatGPT doesn't give a shit unless it's the IP of another US megacorp. But nobody should generate such slop anyway.

Basically the US models are made to be as addictive and ruthlessly profitable as possible, always giving you something while sugarcoating your mistakes (even if that's wrong). It's gambling. Those who're celebrating these things might already be psychologically addicted without realising it.

(This doesn't mean Mistral is great, just not as awful. Their tiny models are already used in weapons in Ukraine, and it's still AI that sucks the planet dry)