this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
162 points (90.5% liked)

Actually Infuriating

917 readers
180 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So, from your perspective, all companies should include, in their marketing campaigns, that they wont break the law for you? lol

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

When their marketing is based on privacy, they need to be honest that they're not going to be private.

I recall other companies using "canaries" to help their customers know that they had been compromised by the government but were legally not allowed to talk about it.

[–] 73rdnemesio@infosec.pub 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They’ve never had a true Warrant Canary. They have however always posted an annual Transparency Report on their blog. Where they reference they advise by Swiss Law. https://proton.me/legal/transparency

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)