this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
1298 points (99.4% liked)

Climate

8407 readers
1321 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the corn grown in the US is not edible. Barely 1.5%. Most of it is grown for sugars, oils and other industrial processes.

not actually true. This is oil and sugar propaganda.

Most of the corn grown in the US is grass. 100% of it, in fact. Soybeans make up a large percentage of animal feed.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the corn grown in the US is grass.

....grass? you mean feed?

or do you mean maise technically being a grass, but having diverged greatly from it's original form via agricultural selection?

if that's the case, when you say most, what's the remainder then?

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I was just posting nonsense in response to the commenter who didn't read what they were responding to. But yeah, I did mean it in the sense that it is highly artificially selected grass. Most being all, the remainder being none

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

ty for the explanation