this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
1088 points (97.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11063 readers
2560 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't know what's going on with that link. Even when I try to go there via my browser history I get the same thing you get now. Good thing I copy pasted part of it.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11778740/ Found better link.

Prison systems would not impact 25 year stats on re offending. There hasn't been better rehabilitation services over that time for sex offenders. Most u.s prisons are private owned. They don't invest in rehab.

Well. I'm going to disagree with you about going easy on sex offenders. Especially those of rape and child abuse.

They absolutely do deserve chemical castration. If they raped or hurt a child, they honestly deserve death from my perspective. Sex crimes are not excusable. They are not forgivable. These are crimes of people who seek out vulnerable people to hurt them. That's not a behavior that they just stop doing.

And I believe they often just get better at hiding their behaviors.

I don't think it's more important we err on the side of allowing them to commit more crimes and create more victims rather than the poor sex predators having their freedoms restricted.

They are lucky that chemical castration is an option as alternative ways to make sure they don't hurt children again are more permanent.

With all the Epstein information coming out, I find it crazy that anyone thinks people who hurt children or rape someone deserve a second chance to do it again. That deserve any leniancy. They don't.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand the strong emotions here, but it's generally a very bad idea to go for physical punishments like chemical castration or a death sentence. Innocent people will get hurt by that, and that's imo an unacceptable injustice. Denying people's rights for whatever reason will be misused or abused.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I acknowledge that wrongful convictions happen. But considering how difficult it is to prove sex crimes in the first place, I don't think this particular type of crime is as risky as some of the others.

That said.

For there to be such extreme punishment, the standards for guilt should be very strongly supported. Videos. Photographs. Medical records.

And there would, of course, have to be some objective guidelines on how that is determined so that it's not applied with bias towards some groups.