Mildly Interesting

25608 readers

731 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

660

In 2022, the American Medical Association called for a permanent end to Daylight Savings Time, citing negative effects on health (www.ama-assn.org)

submitted 1 day ago by pimento64@sopuli.xyz to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

203 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I hope everyone who wants to be on permanent DST experiences an eternity of the first day of spring forward, never rested again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Ok I said I was going to peace out, but unfortunately I have to return.

But most importantly: I went and looked at the paper and the intent: Their argument is that we should quit changing. They just picked one. It could be the other one, it makes no difference, they just want it to stop changing. As any rational human should.

From the article:

move permanently to standard time.

Standard time.

sleep experts say that standard time (which shifts daylight hours earlier in the morning) aligns best with human circadian biology.

Standard time.

But research shows permanent daylight saving time overlooks potential health risks that can be avoided by establishing permanent standard time instead,”

Standard time.

That means you are illiterate.

Please consider this in the future before tellling everyone they are wrong. Peace.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

So you read nothing I wrote. You also read an article. I went and read papers and the publication. Which by the way is more of a report and a summary than a peer reviewed study.

The thrust of the publications is: quit changing the time.

The time they landed on (again I think they are morons for the reasons I explained) is they think it is likely to benefit more people, but not everyone. When taking into account all other factors, including time zones, yearly changes of the earth, latitudes, there is no one size fits all, it just MAY fit slightly better.

Yeah, you probably should just quit talking to me, because it seems no matter how much evidence I provide, you are just going to fall back to arguing about it.