this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
25 points (77.8% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8896 readers
204 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cory Doctorow, on coining the term:

Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. I call this enshittification, and it is a seemingly inevitable consequence arising from the combination of the ease of changing how a platform allocates value, combined with the nature of a "two-sided market", where a platform sits between buyers and sellers, hold each hostage to the other, raking off an ever-larger share of the value that passes between them.

The term was about online platforms degrading. This term described things like going to a subscription model, creating tiered subscription models, injecting more ads, and other practices to min-max short term profit on an online platform once enough customers were locked into it.

Since then a few examples I have seen referred to as "enshittification":

A movie sequel not being as good as the first movie.

A game sequel not being as good as the first game.

An unintentional quality defect on a one-time purchase of a consumable product.

A UI change to software (that didn't lock out previous features or change functionality) that the person personally didn't like.

The price of a new (luxury) product being higher than the complaining person would like.

A restaurant changing their menu.

A specific product being discontinued.

A TV show's writing getting worse.


The term has been so diluted it just means "a thing I don't like happened with any product or service."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think the concept can legitimately extend beyond just online platforms. Not saying it isn't misused, but I think some of your examples can sometimes be the same basic problem:

Like a movie IP being acquired by a studio which forces the writers and directors to make changes in the sequel, to reach a bigger market or push merchandising or something.

Or a game production company forcing game developers to add micro-transactions.

Or new management from private equity forcing a reputable manufacturing company to use lower quality materials and defund QC.

I would broadly describe any situation where an intermediary business between creator and consumer makes things worse for both is enshittification. Online platforms are far from the only culprit.