this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
425 points (95.3% liked)

World News

54706 readers
3099 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China has approved a sweeping new law which claims to help promote "ethnic unity" - but critics say it will further erode the rights of minority groups.

On paper, it aims to promote integration among the 56 officially recognised ethnic groups, dominated by the Han Chinese, through education and housing. But critics say it cuts people off from their language and culture.

It mandates that all children should be taught Mandarin before kindergarten and up until the end of high school. Previously students could study most of the curriculum in their native language such as Tibetan, Uyghur or Mongolian.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wereg@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Then why is it "ethnic unity" and not "language/linguistic unity"? I'm pretty sure the Chinese have terms for "language/linguistic " as they have for "ethnic"...

[–] dgkf@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The original poster's point is precisely that it isn't "ethnic" because it's originally in Chinese (民族) without a direct obvious translation. The linked translated text has a note on their chosen translation:

"民族- ethnic, ethnicity. Official translations are fond of translating this as nationality, which is confusing because it can confuse statehood/citizenship with ethnic identity. In most situations, we use forms of ethnic."

https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/ethnic-unity-and-progress-law/#Notes

For what it's worth, Firefox's translator (bergamot) also translates this as "National Unity". The definition on pleco seems to imply more of an ethnic nation, as in a nation of peoples as opposed to a nation state.

Translation is not a one-to-one mapping between words. The act of translating a text will always distort the meaning a bit. It's good to consider what may have been lost in the process of translation, especially when a contentious translation seems to align with a position that is geopolitically convenient.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Genocide is never convenient, you really gotta go out of your way to make it happen.