I literally posted the same suggestion in this community three days ago as a joke!
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
153 points (99.4% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
600 readers
217 users here now
Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!
Rules:
- Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Double post, but uh, also kind of worth noting that roughly the border between UAE and Oman...
... is a mountain range.
So you'd have to go through the passes, which of course already have highways and towns.
... and basically everything south of Abu Dhabi is a nature preserve.
Also, not sure how out of date this is, but:
Presumably, you would not want to nuke an already existing oil pipeline.
... which my NukeMap 'path'... does, basically.
More nukes are surely going to solve that problem.
Why not? Just fill the canal with oil instead of water and make it the new pipeline. This will also save money by not requiring ships to transport the oil. Or you can drive a ship filled with oil on the canal filled with oil, giving you twice the oil in one go. (certainly no insane troll logic here)
Real life ideas involving nukes to make canals through the desert aren't that much less insane, and also give a rough estimate of the amount and size of nukes required.
Excuse me while I bang my head against a wall enough times that it approximates the level of brain damage as a lead-lined boomer brain.